Of course, to the extent that the provisions of the Bill of Rights
explicitly protect privacy interests against state governments, they do so
only through the 14th Amendment.

Mark Scarberry
Pepperdine

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark S Kende
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/26/2003 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: "General right to privacy"

I won't beat this dead horse any more after this.  I think Eugene is
right
that Thomas' reference to no general privacy right means Thomas thinks
the
only rights relevant to privacy in the Constitution are those Stewart
mentioned in Griswold e.g. Third Amendment, Fourth Amendment.  But
that's
definitely NOT what Thomas said in his confirmation hearings when he
spoke
favorably of Harlan's view of the right to privacy, for example, and
when he said some of the other things Keith mentioned.  Thomas was going
beyond saying the right to privacy was embedded in those amendments --
he
said it emanated from the Fourteenth Amendment.

And I don't agree with Ilya's argument that Thomas can have a
"familial right to privacy" without having any general notion of what
the
right to privacy means.  Mark

Mark Kende
Professor of Law
University of Montana School of Law
Missoula, Montana 59812
406-243-4317 (phone)
406-243-2576 (fax)

Reply via email to