Title: Re: Lopez's Fateful Day at School
It's in the Fifth Circuit opinion--not that Lopez was selling the gun but that he had accepted $ 40 in exchange for his services in delivering the gun to  "Jason" for use in a "gang war." See United States v. Lopez, 2 F.3d 1342 (5th Cir. 1993).  

Ann

From: Robert Justin Lipkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Discussion list for con law professors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:57:40 -0400 (EDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lopez's Fateful Day at School


       I seem to remember reading recently that respondent Lopez carried the gun to school that fateful day in order to sell it. Can anyone verify this?  If so, why wasn't this at least mentioned in the majority and dissenting opinions? Off-list replies are fine.  

Bobby Lipkin
Widener University School of Law
Delaware

Reply via email to