Best,
Louise
Aug. 18, 2003
Dear Matt,
Best,
Louise
At 03:18 PM 8/18/03, you wrote:
I seek the advice of the list members on the following problem. Assume that Chisholm v. Georgia was correctly decided (even if only for the sake of argument). Could Congress have reversed its effect by a mere statutory expedient, rewriting the Judiciary Act to confine the Court's original jurisdiction where states were parties to those cases in which the state was plaintiff but not defendant? Or would that encounter a Marbury problem? In Marbury it was concluded that Congress may not enlarge the Court's original jurisdiction. May the Congress diminish that jurisdiction? Or was the Eleventh Amendment, strictly speaking, absolutely necessary to reverse Chisholm? I beg pardon if this is too obvious for me to figure out (my brain is tired), and I'd appreciate any references to works that address this. I find nothing right away in the books by Jacobs and Orth on this subject.
Matt
***************************
Matthew J. Franck
Professor and Chairman
Department of Political Science
Radford University
P.O. Box 6945
Radford, VA 24142-6945
phone 540-831-5854
fax 540-831-6075
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***************************
