In rereading Gibbons v. Ogden, I was struck by the similarity of Chief Justice Marshall's views on interpretation and Justice Scalia's views on the same as expressed in Scalia's book A Matter of Interpretation. Rather than defend this comparison, let me ask whether there's any literature comparing the interpretive strategies of these two Justices?
Bobby Lipkin
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
- Re: Marshall and Scalia: Birds of a Feather? Robert Justin Lipkin
- Re: Marshall and Scalia: Birds of a Feather? Philip Frickey
- Re: Marshall and Scalia: Birds of a Feather... Christopher Eisgruber
