Dear Colleagues,

Thank you Michael for the summary and of course everybody else who provided 
feedback, both here as well as via private channels.

From what I gathered so far, the neutrality bit seems to be one of the more 
important parts. But I think that is also reflected in the draft guidelines, 
which to me at least read as saying that freedom of choice should be the 
default. There is obviously a reason why the document is expanding quite a bit 
on the circumstances under which this should not be the case, by providing 
examples of “objective technical criteria” that would be acceptable as a 
rationale to ignore the net neutrality part.

Taking it back to my initial question: should we provide input on behalf of the 
RIPE community? I am not feeling that confident that there has been sufficient 
feedback at this stage to submit anything as reflecting the broader opinion of 
the community.

As the secretariat I am in your hands and I am happy to take guidance from the 
chairs. But if as a group we feel this is important, we need to start drafting 
some text that is to the point of addressing the contents of the draft 
guidelines.

Did somebody take the time and look at the criteria in the draft, do they make 
sense from an operational perspective? Of course, we can also submit something 
along the lines of “RIPE community has a strong preference for XYZ”, but to 
make such a statement on behalf of the community, we probably need a bit more 
than the few voices we have heard so far.

Finally, as I mentioned before, the process is still open for people to file 
individual responses. So if there is no consensus on a collective submission, 
not all is lost.

And of course, we will keep monitoring this process and alert you when other 
opportunities to provide input arise.

Best,

Marco Hogewoning
External Relations, RIPE NCC

> On 25 Oct 2019, at 20:12, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> EXEC SUM:
> 
> ** I think that you are looking for text that addresses the net-neutrality and
> ** privacy implications of each attachment point, and leave it to legislators 
> to
> ** figure out which one is best.

_______________________________________________
connect-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg

Reply via email to