On Jun 06, "Barry O'Donovan (Open Solutions)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is correct, but in the end it does not matter in our view: the plan > > agreed by the IXP operators also contemplates educating their members to > > move (or at least replicate) the correct data to the authoritative IRRs. > I think you're referring to the Euro-IX Route Server Workshop held recently > in Rome? No, I am referring to private discussions that me and Stavros had over the past year with other IX operators. > Others have already noted that a BCOP should reflect established /current/ > operating practices, and I think this proposal fails that test. Yes, this is clear now. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ connect-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg
