I think using mcf in the package name and the names of the webapps will likely be fine. I'm less worried about everything else. Grant, any comments?
Karl On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Jack Krupansky <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm okay with all of that, but with a question whether we can get away with > using an abbreviation in "org.apache.mcf" as opposed to > "org.apache.manifoldcf". And then, whether the graduated project would be at > "http://mcf.apache.org"; or "http://manifoldcf.apache.org";. I have no idea > whether there might be pushback higher up on that, but my inclination is to > go ahead with using mcf. I'll defer to Karl as to whether he wants to verify > our assumption through/with Grant/et al or just go ahead. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Karl Wright" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:35 PM > To: "connectors-dev" <[email protected]> > Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF > >> The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we >> didn't hear from lots of folks that made ManifoldCF their #1 choice >> last time. >> >> So, our new name is ManifoldCF. I'm thinking this will translate to: >> >> org.apache.mcf >> MCFException >> MCF abbreviation >> ManifoldCF full name >> webapps mcf-crawler-ui, mcf-authority-service, mcf-api-service >> >> >> ... and I can begin to change the tree around probably by tomorrow >> morning. Sound okay to everyone? >> >> Karl > >
