The vote made it official, as far as I can tell.  If you are referring
to incubator-general, someone probably should post, yes, but given
that the name originally came from there I think that's a formality.
Do you or Grant want to do this?  Or shall I?

Changing the wiki name requires a ticket to be entered for
INFRASTRUCTURE.  No other problem with doing it.
Changing the repository name will yank any changed workareas out from
under the committers, and people who have checkouts.  I believe you
can fix this with "svn switch".  On the other hand, I'd prefer to
finish off a few things first, so I don't risk losing them.
Changing mailing lists and JIRA base name is much more problematic
since we'd lose tickets and history, I think.  So I'd prefer to leave
those alone if we can.

Karl


On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jack Krupansky
<jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
> Where are we as far as making the ManifoldCF name "official"? Or is it merely 
> a matter of posting it on the general list and seeing if anybody has any 
> major objection?
>
> Some other name references that presumably simply await making the name 
> "official":
>
> 1. The repository is still lcf.
> 2. The wiki top level name is Apache Connectors Framework on the Apache 
> Dashboard.
> 3. The mailing list names are "connectors-".
> 4. The Jira name is "CONNECTORS".
>
> Are there any risks with changing the latter two?
>
> -- Jack Krupansky

Reply via email to