I uploaded an RC3. Karl
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I found two other build.xml files that were missing headers. This was > because Grant's implementation of rat-sources was incomplete. So I'm > going to have to spin an RC3. > > I fixed rat-sources. The current output is as follows (excuse the wrap): > > [rat:report] 32 Unknown Licenses > [rat:report] > [rat:report] ******************************* > [rat:report] > [rat:report] Unapproved licenses: > [rat:report] > [rat:report] C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/CDL.java > [rat:report] C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/Cookie.java > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/CookieList.ja > va > [rat:report] C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/HTTP.java > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/HTTPTokener.j > ava > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/JSONArray.jav > a > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/JSONException > .java > [rat:report] C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/JSONML.java > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/JSONObject.ja > va > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/JSONString.ja > va > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/JSONStringer. > java > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/JSONTokener.j > ava > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/JSONWriter.ja > va > [rat:report] C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/Test.java > [rat:report] C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/XML.java > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/json/org/json/XMLTokener.ja > va > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/meridio/webservi > ce/Test Harness/Installation files/Setup.Ini > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/meridio/webservi > ce/Test Harness/source code/TestHarness.cs > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/meridio/webservi > ce/Web Service/Installation files/Setup.Ini > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/sharepoint/webse > rvice/MCPermissionsService.csproj > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/sharepoint/webse > rvice/MetaCarta.snk > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/sharepoint/webse > rvice/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/sharepoint/webse > rvice/Properties/Settings.Designer.cs > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/sharepoint/webse > rvice/Properties/Settings.settings > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/sharepoint/webse > rvice/Web References/SPPermissionsService/Reference.cs > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/connectors/sharepoint/webse > rvice/Web References/SPPermissionsService/Reference.map > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/framework/crawler-ui/src/ma > in/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/c.tld > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/framework/crawler-ui/src/ma > in/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/fmt.tld > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/framework/crawler-ui/src/ma > in/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/sql.tld > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/framework/crawler-ui/src/ma > in/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/x.tld > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/site/src/documentation/skin > s/common/xslt/html/split.xsl > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/site/src/documentation/skin > s/lucene/note.txt > [rat:report] > [rat:report] ******************************* > > > The files under json contain the json.org license, which Apache agreed > was OK despite rat's complaining. > The files under framework/crawler-ui/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp are > all from tomcat, but they were not labeled with appropriate licenses > at that time. Should I attach licenses to these? > The files under site came from Grant's initial check-in of the lcf > site; I don't know their etiology or which license should apply to > them. > > The SharePoint and Meridio web service files are generated files, > which I believe do not need licensing. The generating tool is Visual > Studio. > > Before I generate an RC3, can Grant please let me know what further > should be done here? > > Thanks, > Karl > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There is now an RC2 on people.apache.org. >> >> Karl >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 4:22 AM, Karl Wright wrote: >>> >>>> Tests are now complete for the framework changes. >>>> Robert, Grant, please comment on CONNECTORS-128 about the future of >>>> the FileNet and Documentum connectors. If those connectors are deemed >>>> acceptable, I can generate a new release candidate. >>>> >>>> Karl >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> The preliminary change has been done, and I was able to hand-test a >>>>> good chunk of the modified queries by hand, so I checked it in. I >>>>> still need to test document expiration, however, and I'd like the >>>>> automated tests to cover the modified functionality. I won't be able >>>>> to get to it this until next weekend at the earliest, >>>>> >>>>> During the process of removing string constants from all queries, I >>>>> also noticed that string constants are used by the FileNet and >>>>> Documentum connectors. These connectors have a proprietary, SQL-like >>>>> language (I don't know what the FileNet language is called, but the >>>>> Documentum one is called DQL.) There does not appear to be any way to >>>>> use the equivalent of query parameters for either sql-like language. >>>>> If quoting is always unsafe, that would imply that neither the FileNet >>>>> connector nor the Documentum connector could be made secure, by >>>>> Robert's standards. Of course, the same is going to be true of any >>>>> FileNet or Documentum client code. >>>>> >>>>> Robert, Grant, do you believe I should delete these connectors? >>> >>> No, I don't think you should. If that's the only way to do it, then it is >>> what it is and we have to go with it. >>> >>> >> >
