[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13015008#comment-13015008
]
Karl Wright edited comment on CONNECTORS-92 at 4/2/11 11:47 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
This issue has stalled. The work done so far has created a reasonable
directory structure with a pom.xml everywhere it needs to be. However, beyond
that, nothing more has happened.
It might be worth researching ant with ivy at this point, since that would be a
natural extension of the current build system, rather than trying to go the
maven route entirely.
was (Author: [email protected]):
This issue has stalled. The work done so far has created a reasonable
directory structure with a pom.xml everywhere it needs to be. However, beyond
that, nothing more has happened.
It might be worth researching ant with ivy at this point, since that would be a
natural extension of the current built system, rather than trying to go the
maven route entirely.
> Move from ant to maven or other build system with decent library management
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CONNECTORS-92
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-92
> Project: ManifoldCF
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Jettro Coenradie
> Assignee: Karl Wright
> Attachments: Screen shot 2010-08-23 at 16.31.07.png,
> maven-poms-including-start-jar.patch,
> maven-poms-problem-starting-jetty-and-derby.patch, maven-start-jar.patch,
> move-to-maven-acf-framework.patch, patch-connectors.zip
>
>
> I am looking at the current project structure. If we want to make another
> build tool available I think we need to change the directory structure. I
> tried to place a suggestion in an image. Can you please have a look at it. If
> we agree that this is a good way to go, than I will continue to work on a
> patch. Which might be a bit hard with all these changing directories, but
> I'll do my best to at least get an idea whether it would be working.
> So I have three questions:
> - Do you want to move to maven or put maven next to ant?
> - Do you prefer another build mechanism [ant with ivy, gradle, maven3]
> - Do you have an idea about the amount of scripts that need to be changed if
> we change the project structure
> The image of a possible project layout (that is based on the maven standards)
> is attached to the issue
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
