OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying that Sun/Oracle recently changed the licensing terms sufficiently that substituting the geronimo jars is no longer necessary? If so, what caveats do I need to include in NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt, or should I just copy whatever Chemistry does?
Karl On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache >> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include >> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be >> from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I >> was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF >> for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar >> available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know >> about saaj-impl. > > The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category b > license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though: > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2/ > > > > Dan > > > >> >> (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for >> saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license >> problem? >> >> Thanks! >> Karl >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
