Is my environment wrong, or something like CRLF, locale? I checked out a few minuites ago and run test.
I get: >>>>>> abe:~ abe$ cd /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/ abe:framework abe$ ant run-script-engine-tests Buildfile: /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml compile-core: [javac] /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml:47: warning: 'includeantruntime ' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatabl e builds compile-script-engine: [javac] /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml:109: warning: 'includeantruntime ' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatabl e builds compile-script-engine-tests: [javac] /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml:515: warning: 'includeantruntime ' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatabl e builds run-script-engine-tests: [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest [junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.092 sec [junit] [junit] Testcase: basicConfigurationnodeOperations(org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest): FAILED [junit] expected:<...e" : "value" : "attr[1"="av1", "attr2"="av2]" : << "childn1" : "...> but was:<...e" : "value" : "attr[2"="av2", "attr1"="av1]" : << "childn1" : "...> [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<...e" : "value" : "attr[1"="av1", "attr2"="av2]" : << "childn1" : "...> but was:<...e" : "value" : "attr[2"="av2", "attr1"="av1]" : << "childn1" : "...> [junit] at org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest.basicConfigurationnodeOperations(ExpressionTest.java:514) [junit] [junit] BUILD FAILED /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml:554: Test org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest failed Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2011/09/09, at 16:33, Karl Wright wrote: > I get: > >>>>>>> > C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework>ant run-script-engine-tests > Buildfile: C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\build.xml > > compile-core: > [javac] C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\build.xml:47: warning: > 'includeantruntime > ' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for > repeatabl > e builds > > compile-script-engine: > [javac] C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\build.xml:109: warning: > 'includeantruntim > e' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for > repeatab > le builds > > compile-script-engine-tests: > [javac] C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\build.xml:515: warning: > 'includeantruntim > e' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for > repeatab > le builds > > run-script-engine-tests: > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\test-output > [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest > [junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.586 sec > [junit] > [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.CommandTest > [junit] hello > [junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.07 sec > [junit] > [junit] ------------- Standard Output --------------- > [junit] hello > [junit] ------------- ---------------- --------------- > > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > <<<<<< > > This target can only be run directly after the top-level "ant build" > is run. If you run the test at the top level (ant tests) the script > test is also called. What does your output look like? > > Karl > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Test failure is not ok. Let me try it here. >> Karl >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Shinichiro Abe >> <shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> I tested sharedrive connector/ authority connector >>> on 0.3RC0 and confirmed changes. >>> It worked well. >>> >>> BTW, "ant run-script-engine-tests" said build failed. >>> The same error is in trunk . Is it okay? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shinichiron Abe >>> >>> >>> On 2011/09/08, at 8:17, Karl Wright wrote: >>> >>>> You can find it here: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.3-incubating/ >>>> >>>> There have been a number of significant changes this release, so I >>>> think it's a good idea if at least one other person has a thorough >>>> look at it. >>>> >>>> Karl >>> >>> >>