Is my environment wrong, or something like CRLF, locale?
I checked out a few minuites ago and run test.
I get:
>>>>>>
abe:~ abe$ cd /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/
abe:framework abe$ ant run-script-engine-tests
Buildfile: /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml
compile-core:
[javac] /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml:47: warning:
'includeantruntime
' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatabl
e builds
compile-script-engine:
[javac] /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml:109: warning:
'includeantruntime
' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatabl
e builds
compile-script-engine-tests:
[javac] /Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml:515: warning:
'includeantruntime
' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatabl
e builds
run-script-engine-tests:
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest
[junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.092 sec
[junit]
[junit] Testcase:
basicConfigurationnodeOperations(org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest):
FAILED
[junit] expected:<...e" : "value" : "attr[1"="av1", "attr2"="av2]" : <<
"childn1" : "...> but was:<...e" : "value" : "attr[2"="av2", "attr1"="av1]" :
<< "childn1" : "...>
[junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<...e" : "value" :
"attr[1"="av1", "attr2"="av2]" : << "childn1" : "...> but was:<...e" : "value"
: "attr[2"="av2", "attr1"="av1]" : << "childn1" : "...>
[junit] at
org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest.basicConfigurationnodeOperations(ExpressionTest.java:514)
[junit]
[junit]
BUILD FAILED
/Users/abe/Desktop/new/trunk/framework/build.xml:554: Test
org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest failed
Regards,
Shinichiro Abe
On 2011/09/09, at 16:33, Karl Wright wrote:
> I get:
>
>>>>>>>
> C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework>ant run-script-engine-tests
> Buildfile: C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\build.xml
>
> compile-core:
> [javac] C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\build.xml:47: warning:
> 'includeantruntime
> ' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for
> repeatabl
> e builds
>
> compile-script-engine:
> [javac] C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\build.xml:109: warning:
> 'includeantruntim
> e' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for
> repeatab
> le builds
>
> compile-script-engine-tests:
> [javac] C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\build.xml:515: warning:
> 'includeantruntim
> e' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for
> repeatab
> le builds
>
> run-script-engine-tests:
> [mkdir] Created dir: C:\wip\mcf\trunk\framework\test-output
> [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.ExpressionTest
> [junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.586 sec
> [junit]
> [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.manifoldcf.scriptengine.tests.CommandTest
> [junit] hello
> [junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.07 sec
> [junit]
> [junit] ------------- Standard Output ---------------
> [junit] hello
> [junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
>
> BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> <<<<<<
>
> This target can only be run directly after the top-level "ant build"
> is run. If you run the test at the top level (ant tests) the script
> test is also called. What does your output look like?
>
> Karl
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Test failure is not ok. Let me try it here.
>> Karl
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Shinichiro Abe
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I tested sharedrive connector/ authority connector
>>> on 0.3RC0 and confirmed changes.
>>> It worked well.
>>>
>>> BTW, "ant run-script-engine-tests" said build failed.
>>> The same error is in trunk . Is it okay?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Shinichiron Abe
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2011/09/08, at 8:17, Karl Wright wrote:
>>>
>>>> You can find it here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.3-incubating/
>>>>
>>>> There have been a number of significant changes this release, so I
>>>> think it's a good idea if at least one other person has a thorough
>>>> look at it.
>>>>
>>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>
