Hi Rusty, I know it is hard and Outlook is just utterly broken, but small reminder that this mailing list doesn't do top-posting.
> This seems like it would make the user experience worse. Just because I pick > a specific access point to connect with doesn't mean that I wish to take > manual control.... like if that selected access point drops then I would > really like connman to autoconnect to another known good ap (or to the same > ap when it comes back in a couple of seconds.) I have to agree here. That is not what we want. When the user connects successfully to a network/service then this just means that this becomes one of the services the others wants us to use. If that service is for one reason or another no longer available we have to go ahead and connect to different one. So there is a difference with disconnect and remove. When calling remove the user clearly has no longer interest in that service and we don't care about it anymore. When calling disconnect, it means that the user doesn't wanna use it right now. However it is okay to auto-connect it again next time. For example if the default service gets disconnected. We don't wanna have the user to switch modes. We have to make this decision for the user. Exposing the user to a concept of manual and automatic mode is a bad idea from an experience point of view. It is just way too complex and the user should not be bothered with these details anyway. Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
