Hi Samuel On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 19:42, Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lucio, > > We should keep the same logic as the curent one, which means: > > + for (pattern = device_filter; *pattern; pattern++) { > + if (g_pattern_match_simple(*pattern, devname) == FALSE) > + return TRUE; > + > > And then continue with the nodevice case.
Ok, tomorrow I will send a new version... > > Cheers, > Samuel. > Regards, Lucio Maciel _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
