Hi Julien, On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:24:37AM +0000, Julien Massot wrote: > > > > I also always thought of the link local configuration highly integrated > > into the DHCP support. > > Do you think that i have to use the structure "GDHCPClient"? Yes, that would be better.
> Meaning that the DHCP client falls back to link > > local in case it can not retrieve a valid lease. Should we really bother > > with link local only network configurations? > > > Do you mean that the link local negociation should be launch on each dhcp > fail ? That would make sense, yes. And that should be done by the GDHCPClient. If we later see a need for cases where one wants LL only or no LL at all, we can extend the GDHCP types to support that. Apologies for not having reviewed your patches earlier. I should be able to do that by tomorrow or Friday. Cheers, Samuel. > It's what we want to do for our own need. > > > > > > Regards > > > > Marcel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > connman mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman > > > > Regards, > > -- > Massot Julien > Operating System engineer > Aldebaran Robotics > +33 1 77 37 17 60 > _______________________________________________ > connman mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
