On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 00:20 +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > The patch looks mostly fine, but I think we should also wake sleeping > threads from pacrunner_proxy_set_direct().
Oh crap, yes. I thought along those lines for pacrunner_proxy_set_manual(), which is actually OK because we do it in pacrunner_proxy_enable(). I didn't then check that pacrunner_proxy_set_direct() was the same. Sorry about that. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
