Hi, On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 20:21 +0100, ext Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > + string AuthMethod > > + > > + EAP Phase2 authentication method. For example "gtc", > > + "mschapv2" or "md5". Used to supplement Passphrase > > + field when requesting credentials for 802.1X networks. > > + > I don't think that's what we agreed upon. In fact, and as stated previously, I > don't want to export those gory details to the user.
Unfortunately the handheld UI wants to have some level of details, should it choose to inform the user about the authentication method in use. It does not necessarily need to be the 'AuthMethod', it can also be the 'Type' field as proposed by Henri. > The only thing the user will know is that she/he has to enter this cryptic > string displayed on her/his RSA dongle. Or a company username/password. And > that can be properly handled by the Identity/Passphrase strings sent to the > agent. Here we want to support the user slightly more by giving the UI a chance to help the user with the authentication method. The UI need not inform the user directly about the method, it can use a decently formatted string about "enterprise" or whatever login. I would not like to leave the UI or user at the mercy of selecting between RSA dongles or username/passphrases solely based on the SSID and the non-existence of the username field. There already is a problem that wpa_supplicant is currently not able to give the current gtc challenge with the connection, I really hope gtc challenges are not used for anything useful these days :-) So, how shall the minimum amount of EAP authentication details be given to the UI? Cheers, Patrik _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman