Hi Daniel,
On 04/11/2012 11:19 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 05.04.2012 15:04, Daniel Wagner wrote:
From: Daniel Wagner<[email protected]>
---
src/service.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/service.c b/src/service.c
index 36140f9..6be617f 100644
--- a/src/service.c
+++ b/src/service.c
@@ -2882,6 +2882,11 @@ static connman_bool_t is_ignore(struct connman_service
*service)
if (service->state == CONNMAN_SERVICE_STATE_FAILURE)
return TRUE;
+ if (service->network != NULL) {
+ if (connman_network_get_device(service->network) == NULL)
+ return TRUE;
+ }
+
return FALSE;
}
I think, it would make sense to introduce something like
__connman_network_is_shutdown()
(of course a better name would be nice, ideas), instead of this
network->device != NULL magic. What do you think?
Good idea.
Other name options could be:
__connman_network_is_connectable()
__connman_network_is_disconnected()
__connman_network_is_valid()
cheers,
daniel
Cheers,
Jukka
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
