On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Here we notice Lucas like some weird stuff, first code spell, now >> de-config.h? Go get a beer and stop doing these things ;-) > > From my experience this HAVE_CONFIG_H non-sense exists only because of > legacy and people not knowing there's an easier way to do this. > Changing it was faster than the time you wasted writing this. We > could remove most of the "#define _GNU_SOURCE" since it's useless > exactly because of the config.h.
I just don't see people bothering... not that it's bad, I understand it's good :-) > Btw, I got a beer to write this patch ;-)... not sure why you think > they are opposite to each other. bluez meeting... buuuuuuuuuu > PS: Palmeiras campeão!! bug me again in 10 years ;-) -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [email protected] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
