Hi Alok,
But you might not even have drivers for it, so it won't be possible to get
>  it enabled (my patches does not fix that issue anyway, there is an issue to
>  solve here)
>  And #3 because API 1.0 does not propose anything about that.
>
Cant we just return an different error for hard blocked ? the UI can
interpret the state acc to the error then.
It changes the API 1.0 a bit then. And I consider that a hw rfkilled technology is not an error: it's a configuration issue (see my previous mail about it, what could be done for 2.0). On the contrary, raising an error due to lack of backend and/or driver could make sense (but then again: being not exposed could also be the solution here: then it's up to distro
maintainer to fix the issue... And simplify a lot the UI also ;) ).

What's your opinion about that Marcel?

Tomasz
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to