Hi,

On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 17:26 +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Obviously, this might need some more improvements on how we want
> to handle the AllowedBearers behavior when the policy plugin and
> the application provide a configuration. For exmaple should
> we update the AllowedBearers if the policy changes or just always
> show only the user input. This patch is not perfect but it
> improves the situation clearly.

I think we need to store both what the application requested and what
the policy returned. This in order to be able to react to a changed
'AllowedBearers' without going to the policy module and to receive an
updated policy without having to drop the session in response. It is
also useful to save the current allowed bearers after computing the
outcome of the application's and the policy plugin's bearers, otherwise
that needs to be recomputed all the time.

I need to check what the code does currently.

Cheers,

        Patrik

_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to