On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 15:36 +0200, Jukka Rissanen wrote: > Should this be g_try_new0() instead? > This requires then fixes in callers where return value checks would > be > needed.
With the assumption that this is "small enough", I don't think it's
needed. The next question obviously is how small is "small enough"...
Cheers,
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
