On to, 2014-04-17 at 14:50 +0300, Pasi Sjöholm wrote: > Unfortunately there are numerous of ISP's or organizations which > want to modify/strip X-ConnMan-Status-header away from the > http-responses even the connection is otherwise just fine (eg. no > portals). However they do not modify http-status response codes and > that's when the "204" comes in handy. With this patch ConnMan-users > can use alternative way to check whether their devices are > actually "online"
So the ISP is doing dirty tricks with the HTTP reply, I just wonder why they strip away the headers in this case. Your solution to return 204 sounds quite an ugly hack to me. How can we be sure that the return code is really from your server if we do not have the X-ConnMan-Status in the header? Are you really sure that 204 is never returned by any proxy or other network element? Cheers, Jukka _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
