>It's not a good idea to expose the status url. It's an internal url used >for testing the connection status, >the fact it's also related to wispr is only because both process were >easier to be implemented together >rather than separately.
Most of these captive portals do not even care about the URL you are requesting as they will just show some ad with accept/reject-buttons for the EULA. If you accept the EULA you don't even get redirected to the URL requested but a another page which has more ads. ;) >Maybe we could change the documentation of RequestBrowser() Agent method >so that >if the url is null, browser will have to use whatever default url it wants. The null url is set to ""-string in the __connman_agent_request_browser on agent-connman.c. So it's not really a null anymore when it gets to the browser, and neither it's valid http-url but a request to open ""-named file. So maybe connman should have "start up page" which would be requested in case of url being null if status_url is not ok. Br, Pasi _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman