On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:55 +0000, Thiemo van Engelen wrote:
> The second "problem" is that I do not really like the idea of connman
> relying on the autoscan and flush behaviour of wpa_supplicant for a
> service to be removed after some time, and with it any failure
> associated with it.
> The idea of the plugin is to have it remove a failure after a
> configurable time so it participates again in the automatic reconnect
> mechanism of connman.
The real solution to this is to fix wpa_s to reliably indicate a
connection error in situations with bad WiFi reception vs the situation
where the key is actually wrong. Currently wpa_s is not doing a proper
job here and unfortunately I think it might not be easy to fix wpa_s...
Cheers,
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
