On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 17:06 -0800, Justin Maggard wrote: > Hmm, this looks fishy to me. Wouldn't this read() call change the > pointer, rather than the uint64_t value?
Yes...
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
