On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 17:06 +0000, Philip Withnall wrote:
> Whew, right. I am unlikely to find time to work on this until one or
> three weeks from now, but I have put it on my backlog to look at as
> soon as I can after then. Sorry!
No problem. Thanks for taking time to report the issue and solving it at
least in one way - it works that way too actually.
The only issue I have is that there is a bigger risk of someone
forgetting what errors devices should or should not return, thus the
proposed more generic task of figuring out what response is appropriate
from the technology API. Doing it quickly makes me believe that
-EALREADY should be treated as success (>= 0), but the details matter.
I'll look into this a bit.
Cheers,
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
