On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 15:46 -0300, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> This solves the problem of '496f134ac1001dd2af17b1ee7172643be80edbae'
> for all the generated files, while trying to be safe against partially
> expanded variables.
> ---
>
> Does it still make sense to maintain scripts/connman?
Yes.
> That '$(EXEEXT)' thing was the only way I found to keep it from warning.
I need to look at this on Monday...
Cheers,
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
