Hi Daniel I can only says that it really depends on the box. We tested in an other PC and the ConnMan 1.29 plus patch for NAT is working properly (no need to rp_filter and ip_forward). On my PC I was obliged to enable it. In internet I found http://serverfault.com/questions/304779/per-user-routing-doesnt-seem-to-work and that is exactly what we are trying to achieve and from the comment it seems mandatory having the rp_filter disabled.
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward* # for f in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/rp_filter ; do echo 0 > $f ; done I'll try to test in an other box and provide eventually other logs. Cheers Gianfranco On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/27/2015 08:36 AM, Gianfranco Casanova wrote: > > Hi guys I tested the last version provided by Daniel, containing the > > patch for the NAT table but it is not working properly i.e.; the IP used > > by the two users is the same. > > Attached both the CMD and the LOG from iptables of ConnMan. > > Thanks for the logs. Is this still true? Or was it 'fixed' by disabling > rp_filter? > > Thanks, > Daniel > _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
