Send connman mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/connman
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of connman digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: [PATCH] plugins/pacrunner.c: do not configure our domains
      (Julien Massot)
   2. Re: miracast connections using connman disconnect after 30
      mins (DHCP renewal problem?) (Carl D. Blake)
   3. Re: miracast connections using connman disconnect after 30
      mins (DHCP renewal problem?) (Carl D. Blake)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:33:37 +0200
From: Julien Massot <[email protected]>
To: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>, Julien Massot
        <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] plugins/pacrunner.c: do not configure our domains
Message-ID:
        <CADGp=Qe-6oQy-1QbEwbL+1g7X1MvFJY0QA94kvOmPdk=0lb...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:40 PM, David Woodhouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 15:29 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> On 07/20/2017 09:09 AM, Julien Massot wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Julien Massot <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > My guess is that there is a confusion between our domains,
>> > and the proxy domains.
>> >
>> > The domain configured for the service have no link to the
>> > proxy domain.
>> >
>> > PacRunner says that         array{string} Domains [optional]
>> >
>> > Domain names and IP range for which this proxy
>> > configuration shall be valid.
>> >
>> > So for example a proxy servers may be valid to access website
>> > under the domain example.com to be able to reply to request for
>> > url: http://www.example.com/site/test.html host: www.example.com
>> > but not for http://ipv4.connman.net/online/status.html ipv4.connman.net.
>> >
>> > Just remove this Domain parameter since we don't know for which
>> > domain the proxy server is relevant, assume it's for any domain.
>> I have a hard time following your explanations. Maybe you can elaborate
>> a bit.
>>
>> Anyway, CreateProxyConfiguration is used to create a new proxy
>> configuration if I got the right. And we add method, domainname and
>> nameserver to proxy configuration. So why are method and nameserver
>> okay and the domainname for the default_service not? I am really
>> confused.
>
> For a proxy configuration, the 'domains' list is a list of domains for
> which this proxy shall be used.
>
> If you configure a proxy for "example.com" then it will not be used for
> requests outside that domain.
>
> If you happen to be within the example.com network and you have
> 'example.com' as a default search domain ? and if that network has a
> proxy configured ? that does NOT mean that you should only ever use the
> proxy for requests within 'example.com'. Which is what this patch seems
> to fix.
>
> If you don't support split tunnelling, and you only ever support one
> active network, you should basically *never* be configuring a domain
> list in proxy configurations you give to PacRunner.

Thanks David,
it was what I tried to explain.

Regards,
Julien

-- 





*This email and any attachment thereto are confidential and intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.If you 
are not the intended recipient, please be advised that disclosing, copying, 
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this email 
is strictly prohibited. In such case, please immediately advise the sender, 
and delete all copies and attachment from your system.This email shall not 
be construed and is not tantamount to an offer, an acceptance of offer, or 
an agreement by SoftBank Robotics Europe on any discussion or contractual 
document whatsoever. No employee or agent is authorized to represent or 
bind SoftBank Robotics Europe to third parties by email, or act on behalf 
of SoftBank Robotics Europe by email, without express written confirmation 
by SoftBank Robotics Europe? duly authorized representatives.*
------------------------------




*Ce message ?lectronique et ?ventuelles pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels, 
et exclusivement destin?s ? la personne ou l'entit? ? qui ils sont 
adress?s.Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire vis?, vous ?tes pri? de ne pas 
divulguer, copier, distribuer ou prendre toute d?cision sur la foi de ce 
message ?lectronique. Merci d'en aviser imm?diatement l'exp?diteur et de 
supprimer toutes les copies et ?ventuelles pi?ces jointes de votre 
syst?me.Ce message ?lectronique n'?quivaut pas ? une offre, ? une 
acceptation d?offre, ou ? un accord de SoftBank Robotics Europe sur toute 
discussion ou document contractuel quel qu?il soit, et ne peut ?tre 
interpr?t? comme tel. Aucun employ? ou agent de SoftBank Robotics Europe 
n'est autoris? ? repr?senter ou ? engager la soci?t? par email, ou ? agir 
au nom et pour le compte de la soci?t? par email, sans qu?une confirmation 
?crite soit donn?e par le repr?sentant l?gal de SoftBank Robotics Europe ou 
par toute autre personne ayant re?u d?l?gation de pouvoir appropri?e.*



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:22:27 -0700
From: "Carl D. Blake" <[email protected]>
To: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: miracast connections using connman disconnect after 30
        mins (DHCP renewal problem?)
Message-ID: <1500654147.26575.195.camel@ironhills>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Daniel,

On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 14:16 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Carl,
> 
> On 07/21/2017 12:22 AM, Carl D. Blake wrote:
> > I've been using connman in an application involving doing miracast
> > connections.  I've been using libwds and connman 1.34 as well as
> > wpa_supplicant V2.6.
> > 
> > I'm encountering a problem where I can establish a miracast connection
> > with an android device, but after 30 mins. the entire connection drops.
> > This is the messages I see when that happens:
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Jul 14 22:54:48 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: wlan0: Failed to
> > initiate sched scan
> > Jul 14 23:17:01 cr-400-2ac2 CRON[1523]: (root) CMD ( cd / && run-parts
> > --report /etc/cron.hourly)
> > Jul 14 23:20:01 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: Peer DHCP server: Received
> > REQUEST NIP 0
> > Jul 14 23:20:01 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1884.087547] DHCP - REQUEST [RX]
> > Jul 14 23:20:03 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1886.228326] DHCP - REQUEST [RX]
> > Jul 14 23:20:11 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1894.311831] DHCP - REQUEST [RX]
> > Jul 14 23:20:28 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1911.745592] DHCP - REQUEST [RX]
> > Jul 14 23:19:48 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: message repeated 5
> > times: [ wlan0: Failed to initiate sched scan]
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: p2p-wlan0-1:
> > AP-STA-DISCONNECTED b6:ef:39:39:5b:df p2p_dev_addr=b6:ef:39:39:db:df
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: AP-STA-DISCONNECTED
> > b6:ef:39:39:5b:df p2p_dev_addr=b6:ef:39:39:db:df
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 cpn: * Source unavailable
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: P2P-GROUP-REMOVED
> > p2p-wlan0-1 GO reason=REQUESTED
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: p2p-wlan0-1: interface
> > state ENABLED->DISABLED
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: p2p-wlan0-1:
> > AP-DISABLED
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: p2p-wlan0-1:
> > CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=02:04:4b:58:aa:c0 reason=3
> > locally_generated=1
> > Jul 14 23:20:28 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: message repeated 3 times:
> > [ Peer DHCP server: Received REQUEST NIP 0]
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {RX} 367084
> > packets 399923565 bytes
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {TX} 156 packets
> > 19838 bytes
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {update} flags
> > 102403 <UP,LOWER_UP>
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {newlink} index
> > 10 address 02:04:4B:58:AA:C0 mtu 1500
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {newlink} index
> > 10 operstate 5
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connman-vpnd[940]: p2p-wlan0-1 {update}
> > flags 102403 <UP,LOWER_UP>
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connman-vpnd[940]: p2p-wlan0-1 {newlink}
> > index 10 address 02:04:4B:58:AA:C0 mtu 1500
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connman-vpnd[940]: p2p-wlan0-1 {newlink}
> > index 10 operstate 5
> > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1912.126009] [07-14 23:20:29.280]
> > wl_notify_connect_status_ap: event WLC_E_DEAUTH_IND(6) status 0 reason 3
> 
> This is the out of tree module for Edison's bcm43340? Anyway, the reason 
> code says 3, which is according the spec (if my 802.11 spec reading foo 
> hasn't left me completely):
> 
> "Deauthenticated because sending STA is leaving (or has left)
> IBSS or ESS"
> 
> Table 8-36.

This is kernel 3.10.96 on an Nvidia Tegra X1.  The driver is the bcmdhd
module for the BCM4354.  I don't believe it is out of tree, but I could
be wrong.  Of course, this is on ubuntu 14.04 which is a couple years
old, so I suppose the drivers might need to be updated.

> > -----------------------------------------
> > 
> > I originally thought it had something to do with miracast and asked this
> > question at that site, but the people there thought it might be an issue
> > with connman.
> > 
> > It seems like there might be some issue with DHCP renewal. Does anybody
> > know what's happening here?
> 
> It doesn't look like DHCP, because the wireless driver receives a 
> DEAUTH. Why this is happening? I have no clue. Maybe it is possible to 
> increase the verbosity of the driver and you might see what is going on.
> 
> Maybe ConnMan is also doing something wrong but I would first check if 
> the driver is behaving according the specification. If it is this 
> version I found on github[1] I wouldn't be surprised if there are still 
> bugs in it. Just one commit and no changes since 2015.
> 

I'll increase the verbosity.  The thing is I'm getting this same exact
behavior on an Nvidia Tegra K1 using an AC7260 mini PCIe card, so I
figured it had to be something other than the drivers.

Thanks for your help,
Carl

> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 
> [1] https://github.com/01org/edison-bcm43340




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:00:33 -0700
From: "Carl D. Blake" <[email protected]>
To: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: miracast connections using connman disconnect after 30
        mins (DHCP renewal problem?)
Message-ID: <1500660033.26575.204.camel@ironhills>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Daniel,

On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 09:22 -0700, Carl D. Blake wrote:
> Daniel,
> 
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 14:16 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > Hi Carl,
> > 
> > On 07/21/2017 12:22 AM, Carl D. Blake wrote:
> > > I've been using connman in an application involving doing miracast
> > > connections.  I've been using libwds and connman 1.34 as well as
> > > wpa_supplicant V2.6.
> > > 
> > > I'm encountering a problem where I can establish a miracast connection
> > > with an android device, but after 30 mins. the entire connection drops.
> > > This is the messages I see when that happens:
> > > 
> > > ---------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > Jul 14 22:54:48 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: wlan0: Failed to
> > > initiate sched scan
> > > Jul 14 23:17:01 cr-400-2ac2 CRON[1523]: (root) CMD ( cd / && run-parts
> > > --report /etc/cron.hourly)
> > > Jul 14 23:20:01 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: Peer DHCP server: Received
> > > REQUEST NIP 0
> > > Jul 14 23:20:01 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1884.087547] DHCP - REQUEST [RX]
> > > Jul 14 23:20:03 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1886.228326] DHCP - REQUEST [RX]
> > > Jul 14 23:20:11 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1894.311831] DHCP - REQUEST [RX]
> > > Jul 14 23:20:28 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1911.745592] DHCP - REQUEST [RX]
> > > Jul 14 23:19:48 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: message repeated 5
> > > times: [ wlan0: Failed to initiate sched scan]
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: p2p-wlan0-1:
> > > AP-STA-DISCONNECTED b6:ef:39:39:5b:df p2p_dev_addr=b6:ef:39:39:db:df
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: AP-STA-DISCONNECTED
> > > b6:ef:39:39:5b:df p2p_dev_addr=b6:ef:39:39:db:df
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 cpn: * Source unavailable
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: P2P-GROUP-REMOVED
> > > p2p-wlan0-1 GO reason=REQUESTED
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: p2p-wlan0-1: interface
> > > state ENABLED->DISABLED
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: p2p-wlan0-1:
> > > AP-DISABLED
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[945]: p2p-wlan0-1:
> > > CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=02:04:4b:58:aa:c0 reason=3
> > > locally_generated=1
> > > Jul 14 23:20:28 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: message repeated 3 times:
> > > [ Peer DHCP server: Received REQUEST NIP 0]
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {RX} 367084
> > > packets 399923565 bytes
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {TX} 156 packets
> > > 19838 bytes
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {update} flags
> > > 102403 <UP,LOWER_UP>
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {newlink} index
> > > 10 address 02:04:4B:58:AA:C0 mtu 1500
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[926]: p2p-wlan0-1 {newlink} index
> > > 10 operstate 5
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connman-vpnd[940]: p2p-wlan0-1 {update}
> > > flags 102403 <UP,LOWER_UP>
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connman-vpnd[940]: p2p-wlan0-1 {newlink}
> > > index 10 address 02:04:4B:58:AA:C0 mtu 1500
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 connman-vpnd[940]: p2p-wlan0-1 {newlink}
> > > index 10 operstate 5
> > > Jul 14 23:20:29 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1912.126009] [07-14 23:20:29.280]
> > > wl_notify_connect_status_ap: event WLC_E_DEAUTH_IND(6) status 0 reason 3
> > 
> > This is the out of tree module for Edison's bcm43340? Anyway, the reason 
> > code says 3, which is according the spec (if my 802.11 spec reading foo 
> > hasn't left me completely):
> > 
> > "Deauthenticated because sending STA is leaving (or has left)
> > IBSS or ESS"
> > 
> > Table 8-36.
> 
> This is kernel 3.10.96 on an Nvidia Tegra X1.  The driver is the bcmdhd
> module for the BCM4354.  I don't believe it is out of tree, but I could
> be wrong.  Of course, this is on ubuntu 14.04 which is a couple years
> old, so I suppose the drivers might need to be updated.
> 
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > I originally thought it had something to do with miracast and asked this
> > > question at that site, but the people there thought it might be an issue
> > > with connman.
> > > 
> > > It seems like there might be some issue with DHCP renewal. Does anybody
> > > know what's happening here?
> > 
> > It doesn't look like DHCP, because the wireless driver receives a 
> > DEAUTH. Why this is happening? I have no clue. Maybe it is possible to 
> > increase the verbosity of the driver and you might see what is going on.
> > 
> > Maybe ConnMan is also doing something wrong but I would first check if 
> > the driver is behaving according the specification. If it is this 
> > version I found on github[1] I wouldn't be surprised if there are still 
> > bugs in it. Just one commit and no changes since 2015.
> > 
> 
> I'll increase the verbosity.  The thing is I'm getting this same exact
> behavior on an Nvidia Tegra K1 using an AC7260 mini PCIe card, so I
> figured it had to be something other than the drivers.
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> Carl
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/01org/edison-bcm43340
> 
> 

Here's further logs with debug enabled on the bcmhd driver
--------------------------
Jul 21 17:43:51 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1863.303183]
wl_cfgp2p_listen_complete :Listen DONE for ramain on channel expired
Jul 21 17:43:51 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1863.303460]
wl_cfg80211_mgmt_frame_register :frame_type: 40, reg: 0
Jul 21 17:43:51 cr-400-2ac2 cpn: TVMR: FrameRate = 30.001920 
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1864.797351]
wl_cfg80211_mgmt_frame_register :frame_type: 40, reg: 1
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1864.797399]
wl_cfg80211_remain_on_channel :Enter, channel: 1, duration ms (500)
SCANNING ?? NO 
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1864.797409] CFGP2P-INFO)
wl_cfgp2p_enable_discovery :  DISCOVERY is already initialized, we have
nothing to do
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1864.797416] CFGP2P-DEBUG)
wl_cfgp2p_discover_listen : Enter Listen Channel : 1, Duration : 500
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1864.798289] CFGP2P-DEBUG)
wl_cfgp2p_set_p2p_mode :enter
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1864.798970]
wl_cfg80211_remain_on_channel : Success
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1865.305856]
wl_cfg80211_event :event_type (55):WLC_E_WLC_E_P2P_DISC_LISTEN_COMPLETE
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1865.305887]
wl_event_handler :event type (55), if idx: 0
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1865.305898] CFGP2P-DEBUG)
wl_cfgp2p_listen_complete : Enter
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1865.305906]
wl_cfgp2p_listen_complete :Listen DONE for ramain on channel expired
Jul 21 17:43:53 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1865.306040]
wl_cfg80211_mgmt_frame_register :frame_type: 40, reg: 0
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1866.798942]
wl_cfg80211_mgmt_frame_register :frame_type: 40, reg: 1
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1866.798989]
wl_cfg80211_remain_on_channel :Enter, channel: 1, duration ms (500)
SCANNING ?? NO 
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1866.799000] CFGP2P-INFO)
wl_cfgp2p_enable
_discovery :  DISCOVERY is already initialized, we have nothing to do
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1866.799007] CFGP2P-DEBUG)
wl_cfgp2p_discover_listen : Enter Listen Channel : 1, Duration : 500
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1866.805570] CFGP2P-DEBUG)
wl_cfgp2p_set_p2p_mode :enter
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1866.806217]
wl_cfg80211_remain_on_channel : Success
Jul 21 17:39:01 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[917]: message repeated 5
times: [ wlan0: Failed to initiate sched scan]
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[917]: p2p-wlan0-0:
AP-STA-DISCONNECTED b6:ef:39:39:5b:df p2p_dev_addr=b6:ef:39:39:db:df
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[917]: AP-STA-DISCONNECTED
b6:ef:39:39:5b:df p2p_dev_addr=b6:ef:39:39:db:df
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 cpn: * Source unavailable
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[917]: P2P-GROUP-REMOVED
p2p-wlan0-0 GO reason=REQUESTED
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[917]: p2p-wlan0-0: interface
state ENABLED->DISABLED
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[917]: p2p-wlan0-0:
AP-DISABLED 
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 wpa_supplicant[917]: p2p-wlan0-0:
CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=02:04:4b:58:aa:c0 reason=3
locally_generated=1
Jul 21 17:43:37 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[902]: message repeated 2 times:
[ Peer DHCP server: Received REQUEST NIP 0]
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[902]: p2p-wlan0-0 {RX} 644798
packets 774844458 bytes
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[902]: p2p-wlan0-0 {TX} 151 packets
22432 bytes
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[902]: p2p-wlan0-0 {update} flags
102403 <UP,LOWER_UP>
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[902]: p2p-wlan0-0 {newlink} index 9
address 02:04:4B:58:AA:C0 mtu 1500
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 connmand[902]: p2p-wlan0-0 {newlink} index 9
operstate 5 <DORMANT>
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 connman-vpnd[912]: p2p-wlan0-0 {update}
flags 102403 <UP,LOWER_UP>
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 connman-vpnd[912]: p2p-wlan0-0 {newlink}
index 9 address 02:04:4B:58:AA:C0 mtu 1500
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 connman-vpnd[912]: p2p-wlan0-0 {newlink}
index 9 operstate 5 <DORMANT>
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246164]
wl_cfg80211_event :event_type (6):WLC_E_DEAUTH_IND
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246184]
wl_cfg80211_event :event_type (12):WLC_E_DISASSOC_IND
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246331]
wl_cfg80211_event :event_type (5):WLC_E_DEAUTH
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246343]
wl_cfg80211_event :event_type (5):WLC_E_DEAUTH
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246526]
wl_event_handler :event type (6), if idx: 1
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246754]
wl_notify_connect_status_ap :event 6 status 0 reason 3
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246764] [07-21 17:43:55.569]
wl_notify_connect_status_ap: event WLC_E_DEAUTH_IND(6) status 0 reason 3
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246783]
wl_event_handler :event type (12), if idx: 1
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246790]
wl_notify_connect_status_ap :event 12 status 0 reason 8
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246798] [07-21 17:43:55.569]
wl_notify_connect_status_ap: event WLC_E_DISASSOC_IND(12) status 0
reason 8
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246811]
wl_event_handler :event type (5), if idx: 1
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246818]
wl_notify_connect_status_ap :event 5 status 0 reason 7
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246826] [07-21 17:43:55.569]
wl_notify_connect_status_ap: event WLC_E_DEAUTH(5) status 0 reason 7
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246838]
wl_event_handler :event type (5), if idx: 1
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246845]
wl_notify_connect_status_ap :event 5 status 0 reason 7
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.246852] [07-21 17:43:55.569]
wl_notify_connect_status_ap: event WLC_E_DEAUTH(5) status 0 reason 7
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.247141]
wl_cfg80211_del_key :Enter
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.247151]
wl_cfg80211_del_key :key index (0)
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.247649]
wl_cfg80211_del_key :Enter
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.247658]
wl_cfg80211_del_key :key index (0)
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.248116]
wl_cfg80211_change_station :SCB_AUTHORIZE
mac_addr:b6:ef:39:39:5b:dfsta_flags_mask:0x2 sta_flags_set:0x0
iface:p2p-wlan0-0 
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.248597]
wl_cfg80211_del_station :Entry
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.248605] CFGP2P-DEBUG)
wl_cfgp2p_discover_enable_search : Enter
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.248611] CFGP2P-DEBUG)
wl_cfgp2p_discover_enable_search :already : 0
Jul 21 17:43:55 cr-400-2ac2 kernel: [ 1867.249372]
wl_cfg80211_del_station : Disconnect STA : b6:ef:39:39:5b:df scb_val.val
3
--------------------------------------

I don't see any further messages that indicate why the driver is
deauthorizing.  I do notice that I get the message from wpa_supplicant
that it failed to initiate sched scan right before the disconnect
occurs.  Could this have something to do with it?  I'm unconvinced that
this is a problem with the driver.  The disconnect occurs reliably after
30 minutes of being connected.  I can set my watch by it.

> _______________________________________________
> connman mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/connman




------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/connman


------------------------------

End of connman Digest, Vol 21, Issue 13
***************************************

Reply via email to