Send connman mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/connman
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of connman digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixes and extensions for WPS support
(Daniel Wagner)
2. Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixes and extensions for WPS support
(Daniel Wagner)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 19:52:26 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
To: Jose Blanquicet <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Tiemann <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixes and extensions for WPS support
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi Jose,
On 01/21/2018 05:02 PM, Jose Blanquicet wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Daniel Wagner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Any objection to Robert's v2? Apart of the comment thingy it looks ready to
>> be merged.
>
> No, looks fine to me too.
Thanks for reviewing. Patches applied.
Daniel
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 20:01:49 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
To: Robert Tiemann <[email protected]>, 'Marcel Holtmann'
<[email protected]>
Cc: Jose Blanquicet <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixes and extensions for WPS support
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi,
On 01/21/2018 05:50 PM, Jose Blanquicet wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Robert Tiemann <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> If we will go ahead, I think that maybe it's worth to generate a
>>> PropertyChanged signal to notify Security property has changed when
>>> wps_adversing is added/removed.
>>
>> This would be helpful indeed. My current client code constantly scans
>> for WLANs and reads out all data of all services on _any_ change
>> reported. Not very efficient, but it turned out to be the most
>> reliable way to keep up with changes.
>
> I would say that avoid doing that is exactly the reason why signals are used
> :)
Indeed, this is indeed not really efficient.
>> Alternatively, wps_advertising could be turned into a property in its
>> own right, outside of Security in case Security is not supposed to
>> change. I just thought it would make sense to put it into Security.
>
> I would rather add it into the Security property. Let's see what
> Daniel thinks about it.
Unfortunately, I don't have any spec to read up on this topic. So I
can't really comment on it.
@Marcel any thougths on this?
Thanks,
Daniel
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/connman
------------------------------
End of connman Digest, Vol 27, Issue 18
***************************************
