Send connman mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of connman digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Connman and IWD - Scanning Network - Update? (stef204)
2. if-up if-down scripts or systemd network-online target
([email protected])
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 05:15:51 -0600
From: stef204 <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Connman and IWD - Scanning Network - Update?
To: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Daniel,
Any updates or progress on this issue?
Getting more and more connection issues (frequent disconnections due to "
wlp5s0: disassociated from xx:xx:11:dc:xx:xxf (Reason: 2=PREV_AUTH_NOT_VALID)"
according to dmsg and I think switching to IWD might help.
(I think this issue possibly due to kernel udpates though.)
Any progress in making connman with IWD able to scan wifi would be great.
24.09.2019, 00:25, "Daniel Wagner" <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:09:26AM -0600, stef204 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With reference to this
>> <https://lists.01.org/pipermail/connman/2018-August/022915.html> and this
>> <https://lists.01.org/pipermail/iwd/2018-August/004751.html> are there any
>> updates or further progress to achieve scanning networks with ConnMan + IWD?
>
> Sorry for the late response. Anyway, I haven't done anyting at this
> front. But I planed to start working on this in the coming weeks. The
> summer comes to end so there is more time for evening hackings :)
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 20:45:13 +0200
From: <[email protected]>
Subject: if-up if-down scripts or systemd network-online target
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <20191017204513.185d39dd@huit>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Dear connman maintainer,
is there currently support for this already?
The README [1] does only mention systemd-resolved.
As connmand already integrates with systemd-resolved it would seem the
simplest (and elegant) option to add support for if-up (Wants=) and
if-down (After=) through systemd.
The man-page systemd.special [2] states about `systemd-online`:
```
Units that strictly require a configured network connection should pull
in network-online.target (via a Wants= type dependency) and order
themselves after it. This target unit is intended to pull in a service
that delays further execution until the network is sufficiently set up.
What precisely this requires is left to the implementation of the
network managing service.
```
So if connman would
* start network-online when AT LEAST ONE interface is brought
up and would
* stop network-online when the LAST interfaces would be
brought down
then this could IMHO satisfy most cases for if-up if-down scripts.
What say you? :)
Tormen
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/connman/connman.git/tree/README
[2]
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.special.html
--
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
------------------------------
End of connman Digest, Vol 48, Issue 23
***************************************
