Hi Marcel,

Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Jiajia,
> 
>>>> Using git 6fc258703, I can use set-passhprase and select-netwok to
>>>> associate a WEP network. However I found that the ConnMan/Dhclient
>>>> can not assign the IP automatically. I am running it on Ubuntu
>>>> System.
>>> 
>>> my test system is running Ubuntu 8.10 and that works fine. However
>>> with WEP you have to be 100% sure you enter the right key. If it is
>>> wrong, it will still associate, but then DHCP will fail.
>>> 
>> 
>> I have another problem here. Set-passphrase uses the default key
>> index 1. How could I associate a WEP network with other key index,
>> for example, key[2], key[3] or key[4]?  
> 
> you don't. We just only use key[1]. What do you wanna do with the
> other key sets? That is useless stuff from the good old WEP times. It
> is a broken design anyway.
> 
I agree that different key-index is useless. But most APs selling in the market 
implement four different key-index. What if some end users choose other keys? 
Will you reminder them that only key[1] is available?

>> Using set-passphrase and select-network, I am able to associate a
>> WPA-PSK network as well. But I still fail to associate a WPA-EAP
>> network because not knowing the method of setting WPA certs. Could
>> you give me any hint?   
> 
> The WPA-Enterprise support is currently not implemented. So while
> wpa_supplicant supports it, there is no method to set the certs or
> username/password combination to make this work. This needs extra work
> since we have to design a proper security framework around this. So
> when using pre-shared keys (PSK) it really makes no sense to protect
> these with your life. They are clear text to begin with, but for the
> certs or username/password combination that is different. These are
> really personal details.
> 

okay. Though WPA-Enterprise is not available now, you will implement it, right?

> And don't get confused with WPA-Personal and WPA-Enterprise from the
> wording. The WPA-Enterprise has the personal details that are worth
> protecting :)
> 
> Regards
> 
> Marcel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> connman mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.moblin.org/mailman/listinfo/connman



Thanks,
jiajia_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.moblin.org/mailman/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to