Library and Archives Conservation Education Survey Results

In 2016, The Library and Archives Conservation Education (LACE) Survey was 
commissioned by a consortium of American graduate-level conservation programs 
(SUNY Buffalo State, New York University, and the University of 
Delaware/Winterthur) to assist the Consortium in understanding employer 
expectations of entry-level conservators within research libraries and archives 
and as an aid in setting instructional priorities that will meet the changing 
environments of libraries and archives.  The survey was funded as part of a 
grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. The Consortium retained the 
services of Robert Waller, president and senior risk analyst, and Tessa Thomas, 
both of Protect Heritage Corporation, to conduct the survey. 

Protect Heritage obtained input from 29 conservators and preservation 
administrators at major research libraries, archives and regional centers who 
were identified as leaders in the field and to whom entry-level conservators 
report. The survey process consisted of twenty online questions and a telephone 
interview. Respondents were asked to identify and rank the skills, subject 
areas, and degree of mastery expected in entry-level conservators.  They were 
also asked to indicate the degree to which this instruction should take place 
during graduate study vs. on-the-job training.

Survey respondents ranked two kinds of skills and competencies as most 
important for entry-level conservators to acquire primarily during graduate 
education: basic hands-on treatment skills and a broad functional knowledge of 
conservation techniques, theory, and ethics. They also expect that entry-level 
conservators will receive most of their training in documentation (written and 
photographic) and in material and conservation science during their graduate 
education. Other skills or competencies, such as advanced treatment skills and 
basic preventive conservation were identified as skills that would be partially 
learned on-the-job, building on a basic foundation laid during graduate 
education. Finally, competencies such as advanced preventive conservation 
skills and a functional knowledge of digitization, audiovisual preservation and 
reformatting could be largely developed on the job but respondents expected a 
reasonable degree of familiarity with the basic literature and issues deve
 loped during graduate education. 

Many respondents also emphasized that it is imperative for entry-level 
conservators to understand, at least at a basic level, how this broad 
functional knowledge applies specifically to libraries and archives in contrast 
to museums. While many said parts of an MLIS were helpful, most did not feel it 
was necessary as long as entry-level conservators had a relevant masters degree 
and a sound understanding of the operational structural and research functions 
of libraries and archives that would inform their decision making and 
relationships with colleagues.  They specifically recommended training in 
preservation management as applied to libraries and archives. 

The survey also queried the importance of material-based competencies in the 
functional knowledge of the history, fabrication and conservation treatment of 
bound materials, paper and photographs. This functional knowledge of bound 
materials and paper was very important to most respondents. Functional 
knowledge of photographs was very important to 21% of respondents and 
moderately important to an additional 61%, suggesting that basic instruction in 
photographic conservation be included in the curriculum. 

The complete survey report and appendices can be found at: 

http://artconservation.buffalostate.edu/sites/artconservation.buffalostate.edu/files/uploads/LACEsurvey.pdf
 
<http://artconservation.buffalostate.edu/sites/artconservation.buffalostate.edu/files/uploads/LACEsurvey.pdf>
 


Lois Olcott Price
Adjunct Senior Conservator, Winterthur Museum
Winterthur Professor of Art Conservation,
University of Delaware
[email protected]
******
Unsubscribe by sending a message to [email protected]
Archives through August 2016 at 
http://cool.conservation-us.org/byform/mailing-lists/cdl/
Archives from September 2016 onward at 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to