​​Bridging the Gap

Theory and Practice in the Conservation of Contemporary Art



Maastricht 24-27 March 2019



New Approaches in Conservation of Contemporary Art (NACCA), Maastricht Centre 
for Arts and Culture, Conservation and Heritage (MACCH), and Bonnefantenmuseum 
Maastricht



Call for papers





For several decades already, the conservation of contemporary art constitutes a 
dynamic field of research and reflection. At first, this research was primarily 
instigated by conservation professionals working in or with museums and other 
heritage organisations, but increasingly academic researchers and universities 
have been involved as well. This is visible for instance in the growing number 
of PhD dissertations devoted to challenges in the conservation of contemporary 
art and of research collaborations between academic and professional 
institutions. Although such research is often conducted by researchers with a 
conservation background, it still remains to be seen whether and how their 
findings and insights are translated into the daily work practices of 
conservators in the field – or, vice versa, whether and how the problems and 
dilemmas encountered in conservation practice find their way into broader 
research questions and projects.

Convened towards the end of The European Fine Art Fair in Maastricht, this 
symposium aims to strengthen the exchange between theory and practice in the 
conservation of contemporary art by exploring promising practices (and 
failures) and by critically questioning its conditions and drawbacks. It is a 
collaboration between the EU funded Marie Sklodowska-Curie Innovative Training 
Network New Approaches in the Conservation of Contemporary Art (NACCA, the 
Maastricht Centre for Arts and Culture, Conservation and Heritage (MACCH) and 
the Bonnefantenmuseum Maastricht. Next to the presentation of the 15 NACCA PhD 
projects, it will host several keynote lectures, panels and round tables.



For the panels we welcome papers addressing one of the following themes:



1. Theoretical attempts to rethink the artwork and artist intent and their 
implications for conservation ethics and decision-making.

The problems of contemporary art conservation have generated various attempts 
to develop alternative notions of the identity and authenticity of the work of 
art and of the intentions of the artist. What characterizes these notions and 
what do they imply for conservation ethics and decision-making? How do they 
work in conservation practice – to what extent are they helpful and what are 
their limits?



2. New materials and materialities

On the one hand, new materials (plastics, organic materials, digital media) 
require new forms of scientific expertise to secure their conservation; on the 
other, materials and materiality play a different role in contemporary artworks 
than before. To what extent do insights from more anthropologically and 
philosophically oriented understandings of materiality like material culture 
studies and new materialism help in addressing these issues? What are the 
benefits and limits of these understandings seen from a practice point of view? 
But also, how can (the study of) conservation practices open up new research 
avenues?



3. New modes of production, new modes of collecting

Production processes in contemporary art have become increasingly complex. The 
range of materials used by artists is endless, as is the urge to experiment 
outside of the traditional art production processes and materials. Artist’s 
studios have become complex hubs. Some delegate routinely and delegate to a 
variety of fabricators or industries while others develop highly specialized 
in-house skills. The re-appropriation of found materials and off-the 
shelves/mass produced objects, and the use of delegation, have strong 
implications for the conservation of contemporary art. Modes of collecting and 
displaying contemporary art are also extremely diverse with many non-collecting 
institutions displaying art and institutions commissioning of ephemeral pieces 
that might get acquired later but were not meant to be permanent. How can 
research and theory in conservation help in mapping these complex processes?



4. New approaches to documentation and archiving

In contemporary art, the idea that an artwork is a finished and self-sustaining 
end product made by the artist alone has given way to a more open-ended and 
dynamic conception of the work’s modes of existence. This is especially true 
for allographic and performative artworks and puts a lot of emphasis on the 
gathering, documentation and archiving of information about the processes 
constituting these works. What are promising approaches and models to present, 
display, or reproduce such complex, extensive and dynamic bodies of 
information? What can be learnt from other disciplines in this respect?



5. Challenging professional and institutional roles and responsibilities; 
expanded networks: collaborations and controversies

There is an increasing awareness that traditional role definitions and 
distinctions (as between conservators and curators) are changing, that museums 
need to adapt their infrastructures and go outside their institutions to 
collaborate with stakeholders such as artists and their estates, technicians or 
programmers or the public, and with external experts in order to care for works 
of art. What does this mean in practice? What are best practices and what are 
bottlenecks? What is required for collaborations to be successful and what 
problems may arise?



6. Art, law and the market

To what extent and in what way are conservation strategies in contemporary art 
influenced by legal constraints and by the art market? What happens for 
instance when artists pass away and their work is taken care of by other 
stakeholders like artist estates, gallerists or private collectors? What is the 
role of commercial enterprises (like insurance companies) in conservation? What 
kind of research and theory is needed to account for these influences?

Maximum length of the papers will be 15 minutes.



Please send an abstract (max. 200 words) with a short bio (100 words max) to 
Yleen Simonis, email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



Deadline: November 10, 2018.



Conference fees will amount to 150 € (including lunches and a conference 
dinner).



Links:

http://nacca.eu

https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/macch

https://www.bonnefanten.nl/


******
Unsubscribe by sending a message to [email protected]
Searchable archives: http://cool.conservation-us.org/byform/mailing-lists/cdl/

Reply via email to