Am 10.09.2013 10:02, schrieb Leena Simon: > > I like the idea to join forces. This was the whole purpose of social swarm in > the beginning. I don't think it's necessary to dissolve completely into > another project though. > Hence I prefer the idea of keeping Social Swarm as the political/activist > wing, whereas the technicians join GNU for example.
I strongly suggest that we leave everything as it was before. People developed their personal communication habits, either joining consesus or swarm or both (as I did). Proposing any "change" will only disrupt the ongoing communication and create confusion. Honestly, I do not see that certain people concentrate on the political, others on the technical aspects. Here is a group of technically oriented people with a strong perception of the political aspects. And besides - since I subscribed to both lists - this does not lead to any kind of information overflow. Therefore, I would appreciate if we could terminate this discussion and get back to the issues. I am very glad that the network of people that subscribed to socialswarm or consensus was able to hold a meeting on 24/25.8. in Berlin to prepare the cluster of events at 30C3 to promote socialnet_3.0. Please stay tuned, a description of what we would like to do at 30C3 will follow shortly. -- Klaus Schleisiek Wau-Holland-Stiftung W Postfach 65 04 43 H O L L A N D 22364 Hamburg/Germany S T I F T U N G http://www.wauland.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
