Email digest for the Global Conservation Forum (ConsDistList) egroup.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 1. Summer Internship in Library Materials Conservation, University of 
Washington Libraries, Seattle

 2. Survey Invitation – Glazed Brick Reliefs from Babylon (Ishtar Gate, 
Processional Way, Throne Room facade)

 3. RE: Recommendation for an adhesive for acrylic that has passed the Oddy Test

 4. RE: Recommendation for an adhesive for acrylic that has passed the Oddy Test

 5. Survey on lighting recommendations in the use and display of paper-based 
objects.

 6. Reviewing books for the JAIC

 7. RE: Microscope for media ID through glazing

 8. RE: Canvas Stamp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.From: Leith Calcote
 Posted: Wednesday December 17, 2025  6:43 AM
 Subject: Summer Internship in Library Materials Conservation, University of 
Washington Libraries, Seattle
 Message: Internship in Library Materials Conservation, University of 
Washington Libraries, Seattle, WA

 With generous funding from the Mellon Foundation, the University of Washington 
Libraries is pleased to offer a 10-week summer internship open to qualified 
applicants.  Individuals from historically underrepresented groups are 
encouraged to apply and affiliation with the University of Washington is not 
required, but please note that we are unable to sponsor a visa for this 
internship.  

Application deadline is Monday, February 2, 2026.

 

This is a full-time (40 hours per week) summer program.  Duration is 10 weeks, 
with exact dates to be arranged between June and September 2026.  The 
internship provides a $8,000 stipend.

 

We are looking for interns who:


Have good hand skills and attention to detail.
Are interested in pursuing a career in the conservation of library materials.
Have some previous experience with sewn book structures.
Are actively preparing for a graduate level conservation program.
Have a portfolio of work to share that includes examples of bookbinding, 
artwork or other hand crafts, and/or other conservation experiences.

 

Working mainly under the supervision of the Senior Conservator of Books and 
Paper, the intern will have the opportunity to perform a range of conservation 
treatments on rare books, manuscripts, and other archival and special 
collections materials on paper.  The intern will develop skills in treatment 
decision making, prepare condition and treatment reports with appropriate photo 
documentation, and gain additional experience in conservation treatment.

 

The intern will also have the opportunity to learn about other aspects of the 
work of the preservation department as desired.   A discussion will take place 
before the internship to help align the projects to the intern's skills and 
interests as much as possible.

 

For additional information, or to apply, see:

 

https://lib.uw.edu/about/employment/students/summer-conservation-internship/ 
<https://lib.uw.edu/about/employment/students/summer-conservation-internship/>

 

To ensure consideration, applications should be received no later than 5:00 pm 
(PST), Monday, February 2rd, 2026. 


------------------------------
Leith Calcote
Senior Conservator for Books & Paper
University of Washington Libraries
Seattle
------------------------------


2.From: Laura Görke
 Posted: Wednesday December 17, 2025  6:44 AM
 Subject: Survey Invitation – Glazed Brick Reliefs from Babylon (Ishtar Gate, 
Processional Way, Throne Room facade)
 Message: 
Dear all,
I am a master's student in archaeological conservation at the University of 
Gothenburg, Sweden. I am currently researching glazed brick reliefs from 
Babylon (Ishtar Gate, Processional Way, and Throne Room facade) for my thesis.
As part of my research, I am seeking insights from conservators, curators, and 
anyone who has experience studying and working with this material. My survey 
aims to gather object-specific information, with a focus on conservation 
concerns.
 
The survey is anonymous, unless you wish to provide your contact information 
for follow-up, and all responses will be treated confidentially.
 
https://samgu.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0ieDPA7l7GNwAZM 
<https://samgu.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0ieDPA7l7GNwAZM>
 
Thank you for contributing your expertise to this project!
 
Best regards,
Laura Goerke
 

University of Gothenburg, Sweden
M.S. Conservation of Cultural Heritage Objects, specialising in archaeological 
materials


------------------------------
Laura Görke
Conservator
Ahrensburg
Germany
------------------------------


3.From: Gerhard Eggert
 Posted: Wednesday December 17, 2025  6:44 AM
 Subject: RE: Recommendation for an adhesive for acrylic that has passed the 
Oddy Test
 Message: 
In 'The Oddy-torium' project, many conservation materials were Oddy-tested in 
Stuttgart following the most recent British museum protocol. Included are some 
acrylics which might work for your purpose. For a full list, please have a look 
at bit.ly/Oddytorium.





------------------------------
Gerhard Eggert
Professor Emeritus
Institute of Conservation Sciences
Stuttgart State Academy of Art and Design
Germany
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-16-2025 10:31
From: Claire Curran
Subject: Recommendation for an adhesive for acrylic that has passed the Oddy 
Test

Hello,
We are in the process of creating a sealed display and storage enclosure for a 
gold-plated brass record. I have attached a schematic that illustrates the 
enclosure. The client chose acrylic sheet for all three layers and a through 
acrylic bolt/rod. Later additions to this diagram include acrylic washers 
adhered to the interior sides of each outer sheet of acrylic to 
secure/immobilize the record within the enclosure, resulting in the appearance 
of the record floating. In this way the record only makes contact with the 
through acrylic rod and the washers on either side of the record.
We are running in to an issue with finding an adhesive to adhere the rod and 
washers to the acrylic sheet that passes the Oddy Test. While we are open to 
using solvents for adhesion, given the health risks, we are hoping to avoid 
this. Can anyone recommend an adhesive for acrylic that is safe for use in a 
sealed enclosure? 
Thank you!
Claire



------------------------------
Claire Curran
Objects Conservator
ICA-Art Conservation
Cleveland
United States
------------------------------


4.From: Mark Anderton
 Posted: Wednesday December 17, 2025  11:09 AM
 Subject: RE: Recommendation for an adhesive for acrylic that has passed the 
Oddy Test
 Message: 
Hi Claire,

I had an acrylic adhesive, Tensol 12, Oddy tested in 2023 by CMAS as it had 
been used by an external mount maker and this passed as suitable for permanent 
use. It's a methyl methacrylate monomer dissolved in solvent - presumably 
dichloromethane and 2-phenoxyethanol according to SDS documentation. 

However, you would have the same consideration of ensuring you have the 
appropriate RPE and/or LEV extraction whilst working with Tensol 12 as you 
would with an acrylic solvent, e.g. dichloromethane. Also, as this is a sealed 
enclosure I would recommend allowing an adequate time for the solvent and any 
VOC's to off-gas before you place the object inside it. At National Museums 
Liverpool we would specify 4 weeks, however I appreciate time-scales on 
projects don't always allow for this.

Please find the details of the Oddy test results below, and the report 
attached. Let me know if you have any questions.






Result usability
Publish
Test Type
Rating
Regular retest
TEST NUMBER
Brand Name/Line
Manufacturer (M) 
Supplier (S)
Category
Proposed use
Material/Composition
Colour
Reference
Ag (P/U/F)
Cu (P/U/F)
Pb (P/U/F)
pH
Fugitive dye?
Test Company
Test Job No.
NML Sample Ref
Date (end of test)


Testing Valid

Oddy Test
P

0662
Tensol 12
Manufacturer - Bostik, Supplier - Amazon
ADHESIVE
SHOWCASE MOUNTS
Solvent-based adhesive, methyl methacrylate monomer  in solutiont - presumably 
dichloromethane and 2-phenoxyethanol according to SDS documentation.
Clear
Clear
P
P
P


CMAS
J2996

29/11/2023





Kind Regards,
Mark




------------------------------
Mark Anderton
Preventive Conservator

National Museums Liverpool
Liverpool, England, United Kingdom
[email protected]
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-16-2025 10:31
From: Claire Curran
Subject: Recommendation for an adhesive for acrylic that has passed the Oddy 
Test

Hello,
We are in the process of creating a sealed display and storage enclosure for a 
gold-plated brass record. I have attached a schematic that illustrates the 
enclosure. The client chose acrylic sheet for all three layers and a through 
acrylic bolt/rod. Later additions to this diagram include acrylic washers 
adhered to the interior sides of each outer sheet of acrylic to 
secure/immobilize the record within the enclosure, resulting in the appearance 
of the record floating. In this way the record only makes contact with the 
through acrylic rod and the washers on either side of the record.
We are running in to an issue with finding an adhesive to adhere the rod and 
washers to the acrylic sheet that passes the Oddy Test. While we are open to 
using solvents for adhesion, given the health risks, we are hoping to avoid 
this. Can anyone recommend an adhesive for acrylic that is safe for use in a 
sealed enclosure? 
Thank you!
Claire



------------------------------
Claire Curran
Objects Conservator
ICA-Art Conservation
Cleveland
United States
------------------------------


5.From: Maria Witkowska
 Posted: Wednesday December 17, 2025  11:09 AM
 Subject: Survey on lighting recommendations in the use and display of 
paper-based objects.
 Message: Dear All,
I am a student of art conservation and restoration (speciality: conservation 
and restoration of books, prints and antique leather) at the Academy of Fine 
Arts in Warsaw.
As part of my MA thesis, I am conducting a survey focused on the analysis of 
professional practice and the implementation of lighting recommendations in 
conservation. Its aim is to examine actual conditions related to the display 
and storage of paper-based objects, to identify major challenges, and to 
outline possible directions for future solutions.

I would really appreciate if you consider completing the survey:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd_fxLrF7kY13iQ8xpTvOWS14BX1AVuqHsHjktKK7zsmqPY3A/viewform?usp=dialog
 
<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd_fxLrF7kY13iQ8xpTvOWS14BX1AVuqHsHjktKK7zsmqPY3A/viewform?usp=dialog>
 
Completing the questionnaire will take approximately 15–20 minutes.

Thank you!
Maria Witkowska



------------------------------
Maria Witkowska
student of art conservation (books, prints and antique leather)
Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw
------------------------------


6.From: Rebecca Rushfield
 Posted: Wednesday December 17, 2025  11:09 AM
 Subject: Reviewing books for the JAIC
 Message: Are you interested in joining a pool of book reviewers who can be 
called upon to review recently published books for the JAIC? Are you interested 
in reviewing a foundational conservation publication (which may or may not have 
been reviewed in the JAIC when first published) in terms of its relevance for 
today's conservators. If you are, please contact Rebecca Rushfield, Book Review 
Editor at [email protected] <[email protected]>. To join 
the reviewer pool, please let us know your general areas of expertise and the 
topics you would be interested in reviewing. To review a foundational text, 
please let us know which book you are interested in reviewing.


------------------------------
Rebecca Rushfield
Conservation Consultant
Freelance/Private Practice/Self-employed/Independent
Flushing NY
------------------------------


7.From: Steven Prins
 Posted: Wednesday December 17, 2025  5:04 PM
 Subject: RE: Microscope for media ID through glazing
 Message: 
Hi Emily,


Your observation regarding the recommended Dino Lite is a common bug in 
handheld digital microscopes: their magnification and focus do not correspond 
in a linear manner as one expects from experience with mechanical optical 
microscopes.  And their focal distances tend to be short, certainly less than 
vitrine scale and often less than the depth of common frame glazing.  Following 
on what George said, you might benefit from reframing the question by defining 
what magnification and focal distance you need.  Keep in mind the basic optics 
we all know from personal experience:  magnification and working distance are 
generally inversely related, the higher the power the shorter the distance, to 
see something better we move closer to it.  Make sure to check minimum 
working/focus distance on any scope you consider, as that is where you are 
going to want to have the greatest flexibility.  Gawain's charts you referenced 
rely on 60x and 150x magnification.  Start there and see what kind of
 working distances you can find with different types of scopes with different 
magnification.  (Thanks Gawain)  Also consider fixed magnification instruments, 
which will eliminate the zoom issues while still allowing for magnification 
multiplication.  A 6x objective provides 60x magnification with a 10x ocular 
and 120x with a 20x ocular.  Or as Amscope likes to do it on their measurement 
scopes, you can achieve 25, 50 and 100x magnification with a 10x ocular by 
interchanging objectives, which is in fact the better way to go optically 
(https://amscope.com/products/h2510-5m?variant=40347596193967 
<https://amscope.com/products/h2510-5m?variant=40347596193967>).  Combined with 
a c-mount camera you can also digitally enlarge images on your computer.  With 
the proper adapter the camera on your mobile device can also be used to enlarge 
the optical image on instruments with longer working distances.  There are a 
lot of monoculars
 
(https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1631494-REG/opticron_30176_8x20_gallery_scope_roof.html
 
<https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1631494-REG/opticron_30176_8x20_gallery_scope_roof.html>)
 and loupes 
(https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1626175-REG/adox_60715_precision_loupe_10x.html
 
<https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1626175-REG/adox_60715_precision_loupe_10x.html>)
 available with magnifications of 6 - 12x that might work for you.  For 
microscopes, a good place to start looking is: Edmond Optics 
<https://www.edmundoptics.com/p/45x-microscope-10-x-30-scope/4388/>. 


Hope that helps.  Looking forward to hearing what you find out from your own 
research.  


Best wishes to all from sunny Santa Fe, 


------------------------------
Steven Prins 
Santa Fe, NM
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-15-2025 11:10
From: Emily Cloutier
Subject:  Microscope for media ID through glazing


Hi Gawain,

thank you for the suggestion, that model definitely looks like the Cadillac 
version of digital microscopes! I took a quick peak at the specs, and it looks 
like the working distance is still pretty short for higher magnification. For 
example, at 150x the working distance is less than 1/4". Have you tried it with 
framed works yet?

It looks great for lower magnifications though.

BTW I have your amazing process ID charts on the corner of my desk. It is 
incredibly generous of you to share them freely and I, for one, am very 
appreciative.

Thanks again!

Emily


------------------------------
Emily Cloutier
Conservator - Art on Paper and Photographs
Musée des beaux-arts de Montréal
Montreal
Canada
------------------------------

Original Message:
Sent: 12-02-2025 11:44
From: Gawain Weaver
Subject:  Microscope for media ID through glazing


Hi Emily--I did this for a museum collection survey and used a Proscope HR2 
with a 400x lens (I used a 400x lens because I needed to differentiate 
Cibachrome from dye coupler prints, which needs the additional magnification). 
I had to remove the clear plastic tip that was made to keep the subject at a 
distance that was in focus. The distance from the front of the glazing to the 
surface of the print took the place of the plastic tip. It also had a lens that 
could be focused. The Proscope line is discontinued (and mine just failed after 
10 years), but I just purchased a Dino-Lite Edge Plus AM8517MZT (US$1399!), 
which also has a plastic tip that helps with setting the focus distance, so I'm 
guessing that it will be able to serve a similar function. While this unit is 
8MP and 10x-220x, there are lower resolution options from Dino-Lite that are 
somewhat more affordable.

Gawain


------------------------------
Gawain Weaver
Photograph Conservator
Gawain Weaver Art Conservation
San Francisco Bay Area
Free Process ID Charts: http://gawainweaver.com/processID 
<http://gawainweaver.com/processID>

Original Message:
Sent: 12-01-2025 12:14
From: Emily Cloutier
Subject: Microscope for media ID through glazing


Hello all,

I am looking for some kind of portable microscope (digital or analog) with a 
longer depth of field. Basically, I am looking for something that would allow 
me to examine framed graphic and photographic works through glazing, mostly for 
media identification.

I have a couple of pocket microscopes that are great, but the subject has to be 
up against the microscope to be able to see anything, so even a 1/4" gap + 
thickness of the glazing is enough to make them useless with framed works. 

 Has anyone solved this problem? 

Thanks!

Emily


------------------------------
Emily Cloutier
Conservator - Art on Paper and Photographs
Musée des beaux-arts de Montréal
Montreal
Canada
------------------------------


8.From: Steven Prins
 Posted: Wednesday December 17, 2025  5:05 PM
 Subject: RE: Canvas Stamp
 Message: 
Belatedly, Heather, I wanted to say that your prejudice is neither exclusively 
American nor unfounded.  Colormen in Europe began stamping their prepared 
canvases by the mid 19th Century, even before they were being industrially 
manufactured.  The fact that you were able to identify it as a tax/duty stamp 
is, I think, a profound testament to the amazing breadth and depth of 
knowledge, not to mention generosity, of our professional community.  


Still haven't had any word on Alex Katlan, the American pioneer of canvas 
stamps.  Hope he is still with us and doing well at this special time of year.  


Happy holidays everybody.  





------------------------------
Steven Prins 
Santa Fe, NM
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 11-08-2025 19:41
From: Heather Galloway
Subject:  Canvas Stamp


Dear All,

Thank you for all the resources.  I find a rather humorous that as an American 
I was thinking of Colourman's stamps when it is an import duty!  

Again, thanks for all the suggestions.

Best,

Heather


------------------------------
Heather Galloway
Conservator, Fellow
Galloway Art Conservation
1305 W 80th St. Suite #225
Cleveland, OH 44102
------------------------------

Original Message:
Sent: 11-08-2025 12:34
From: Ian Primrose
Subject:  Canvas Stamp

Heather,

The word above 2J8 is LINENS, and is likely a Duty Stamp. I have attached a 
similar example (look at the sideways mark below the 80), taken from the 
National Portrait Gallery, London, resource - British artists' suppliers, 
1650-1950, subsection - British canvas, stretcher and panel suppliers' marks, 
Part 1, 1785-1831.

Hope this helps,

Ian Primrose
Restorer


Original Message:
Sent: 11/7/2025 3:32:00 PM
From: Heather Galloway
Subject: Canvas Stamp


I have an unlined British painting in my studio from 1822 that has a repeated 
canvas stamp that is difficult to read.  The artist worked in London.  The 
stamp is topped with a crown and the bottom appears to read "2J8" but most of 
the image did not take well to the linen.  I'm attaching an image of the 
clearest impression in the hopes that someone might recognize it.  

Thanks,

Heather


------------------------------
Heather Galloway
Conservator, Fellow
Galloway Art Conservation
1305 W 80th St. Suite #225
Cleveland, OH 44102
------------------------------




You are subscribed to "Global Conservation Forum (ConsDistList)" as 
[email protected]. To change your subscriptions, go to 
http://community.culturalheritage.org/preferences?section=Subscriptions.  To 
unsubscribe from this community discussion, go to 
https://community.culturalheritage.org/HigherLogic/eGroups/Unsubscribe.aspx?UserKey=d16eaa87-0f69-494b-9f2f-303dbc1222e1&sKey=fab9aa4f27a04c5d876e&GroupKey=757a8f16-505f-4323-8e74-e376757aa9f7.

Reply via email to