I have two rules: substitute (tagX LOC) (tagX LOC tagY) (tagX LOC); substitute (tagX TEMP) (tagX TEMP tagY) (tagX TEMP);
Is there any way of conflating these in one rule? I wondered about creating a set: CLASSTAGS = LOC TEMP; and using that in the rules, but I can't see that this would work, because the substitute locations and the thing being substituted both contain actual tags as well as what would be a set. Is the assumption that this can't be done correct? -- Pob hwyl / Best wishes Kevin Donnelly kevindonnelly.org.uk cymraeg.org.uk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Constraint Grammar" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/constraint-grammar. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
