Hi, I was wondering whether anyone in this group is using "universal features" (http://universaldependencies.org/u/feat/index.html) as part of their Universal Dependency part-of-speech tagging in Constraint Grammar. If so, are there any conventional or recommended ways of tagging universal features within CG. For example, a word could have the following set of features in addition to its POS tag: VerbForm=Fin|Mood=Ind|Tense=Pqp
The resource below on modelling dependency grammar in CG is helpful, but it does not address this point. visl.sdu.dk/~eckhard/powerpoint/CG_ESSLLI_Thursday.pdf Would there be any interest or value in adding and being able to operate on Key=Value type tags? Thanks, Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Constraint Grammar" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/constraint-grammar. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
