Dunno if you ever figured this out, but here are some solutions:
First, you could just write two rules, one asking for masculinum when
target is filho, and another for femininum when target is filha. Assuming
words are tagged Masc or Fem:
SETPARENT ("filho" @N<PRED) (1 ("de")) TO (*-1 (@SUBJ> PROP Masc) BARRIER
CLB-ORD) ;
SETPARENT ("filha" @N<PRED) (1 ("de")) TO (*-1 (@SUBJ> PROP Fem) BARRIER
CLB-ORD) ;
Second, you could use top-level set unification and group all masc/fem tags
into sets and ask that they agree:
LIST Mascs = "filho" Masc ;
LIST Fems = filha"" Fem ;
SET Genders = Mascs OR Fems ;
SETPARENT &&Gender (@N<PRED) (1 ("de")) TO (*-1 &&Gender + (@SUBJ> PROP)
BARRIER CLB-ORD) ;
See https://visl.sdu.dk/cg3/chunked/sets.html#set-unification-set for
documentation.
-- Tino Didriksen
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 22:24:10 UTC+2, Alexandre Rademaker wrote:
>
> SETPARENT ("filho" @N<PRED) (1 ("de")) TO (*-1 (@SUBJ> PROP) BARRIER
> CLB-ORD) ;
>
> is to make the target test using the lemma instead of the wordform
> "filho" and make it always agree with the gender of the <contextual_target>!
> How to make it? In that case, we would have a right analysis of cases for
>
> X ... filho de ....
> Y .... filha de ...
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Constraint Grammar" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/constraint-grammar.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
