On 25. 2. 2016 13:44:15, Scott McCarty wrote: > Sorry for cross posting, but I think the CDK is so central to our story with > containers. I think we have a strategic advantage here, and I want to get > this word out desperately :-) > > Tweet: https://twitter.com/fatherlinux/status/702926242333519872 > Blog: > http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2016/02/25/getting-started-with-the-red-hat-container-development-kit-cdk/ > > P.S. Clayton, I stole you phrase in my Tweet ;-) I have come around... > > Best Regards > Scott M
Hi Scott, It's great to see more how-to's for CDK, but we (the CDK dev and docs teams) are a bit concerned that the stuff that is being described in the blog will no longer be valid come 2.0 GA. In fact, it won't be valid even for the next beta (beta5). It'd be great if the authors of the blog could get in touch with the dev team and the docs team. Not only to update the contents of the blog when it becomes relevant but also to know what's in the pipeline, so that all the efforts can be better coordinated. I'm adding the cdk-internal list for that purpose. One last thing: It'd be nice to add links to official CDK docs to the blog. Right now, we have an Installation Guide [1] (for Win, Mac, RHEL) and a Getting Started Guide [2] (which will continue to grow): [1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-enterprise-linux-atomic-host/version-7/container-development-kit-installation-guide/ [2] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-enterprise-linux-atomic-host/version-7/getting-started-with-container-development-kit/ Regards, -- Robert Krátký Sr. Technical Writer | CCS Red Hat Czech Brno, Czech Republic _______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
