On 03/04/2016 12:03 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
PLEASE disregard last email - the subject of the message was wrong
The vagrant-service-manager plugin is modifying the "flavor" guest capability
[1].
This has side effects on code (example at [2]) that assumes it is going to get
back
the that is returned from the actual flavor cap in vagrant core code [3].
This is why hardy had such a hard time getting sshfs installed on his
machine earlier today. The vagrant-sshfs plugin wasn't able to
properly detect things and it didn't install sshfs for him.
Opening up an issue on the plugin at [4]
Dusty
[1]
https://github.com/projectatomic/vagrant-service-manager/blob/master/plugins/guests/redhat/cap/flavor.rb
[2]
https://github.com/dustymabe/vagrant-sshfs/blob/master/lib/vagrant-sshfs/cap/redhat/sshfs_client.rb#L26
[3]
https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/blob/master/plugins/guests/redhat/cap/flavor.rb
[4] https://github.com/projectatomic/vagrant-service-manager/issues/91
_______________________________________________
Container-tools mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
This was unintended. I was unaware that if we change a method of a guest
capability , it will effect other plugins. As I have mentioned in the
issue we want to introduce new guest capability named CDK and ADB
similar to how fedora inherits from redhat (in Vagrant code base) then
implement flavor method for CDK and ADB. This way we are not changing
redhat capability's flavor method. But the current code seemed easy to
implement.
Sorry for the inconvenience caused.
-Lala
_______________________________________________
Container-tools mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
