On 4 March 2016 at 14:45, Dusty Mabe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So what I'm wondering is whether or not it might make sense for us to > > explore ways to offer an alternate partitioning scheme for Anaconda > > that was tailored to container based development, rather than > > expecting people to reconfigure their system post-installation? (The > > system reconfiguration instructions would still be desirable, but > > could hopefully be made less frequently needed, especially in > > centrally managed environments) > > Your question is valid, but is this the right list?
My interpretation of the "container-tools" list charter was that it covered container based development UX generally, so of the lists I'm already subscribed to, it seems the closest, and once we expand the question beyond the lists I'm subscribed to, I have too many open questions to know where to start. * I don't know where to look up the current disk partitioning scheme used in Fedora (other than reading the change lists for F23 & F24 to see if either changed it away from the LVM setup in F22) * I don't know where to look up Anaconda's abilities in this area to gauge whether I'd be asking for a configuration change or actual feature development work * I don't know what a reasonable size for a docker-storage-setup volume would actually be So posting here about it was mainly a matter of "maybe I'm missing something, and this would be easier than I think" wishful thinking :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
