Hi, On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Charlie Drage <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like us to collaborate and come up with a new spec version > which is cleaner and easier to interpret. > > Decreasing the high-learning curve of our current spec and making > collaboration and creation of a Nuleculized application *a lot* more > straight-forward. > > I've come up with a raw example of what it would ideally look like. > > Below is a link to a pull-request that contains an example of an > application using a new specification of Nulecule. > > https://github.com/projectatomic/nulecule/pull/205 > > I've created it as a pull-request so people can easily comment on > each-line of the specification as well as have a high-level discussion > on the PR itself publically on GitHub. > > Not only that, but I've also included the concept of "manual" and > "automatic" building of orchestrated containers via the Nulecule spec. > Which some of you might find interesting. > > This is open to not only core-contributors but community contributors as > well. If you've always wanted to have a say on the Nulecule spec and > have an opinion on what it should look like, please feel free to > contribute!
Nice work Charlie to start this up, +1. > > -- > > Charlie Drage > Red Hat - OSAS Team / Project Atomic > 4096R / 0x9B3B446C > http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x622CDF119B3B446C > > _______________________________________________ > Devtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools -- - Suraj Deshmukh (surajd) https://deshmukhsuraj.wordpress.com https://twitter.com/surajd_ _______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
