On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:15, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > On 11/15/2010 09:03 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> (from the ConTeXt mailing list: problem with beta for linux-64; about >> missing executable bit of luatex) >> >>> Strange, I do always: cd ~/minimals&& svn up&& ./do_all.sh >>> I'll take a look at it... >> >> There is (in bin_commit.sh): >> >> svn add -q "$BINS/luatex/$ver_new_luatex" >> svn add -q "$BINS/luatex/$ver_new_luatex/luatex" >> svn delete "$BINS/luatex/current/luatex" >> svn cp "$BINS/luatex/$ver_new_luatex/luatex" "$BINS/luatex/current/" >> >> If luatex/current doesn't get the executable bit set, my only >> explanation is then that the last line forgets to copy the executable >> bit along. >> >> I can set it explicitely once again, but I would nevertheless like to >> know what is going on. (I have fixed it now in repository, but it is >> going to repeat next time if I don't fix the building scripts.) > > You have to set the executable bit in SVN, I think. > > $ svn propset svn:executable ON luatex
I know that. But "svn cp" should copy the executable bit along, shouldn't it? It works in other platforms, it works as a separate test on Peter's machine. We both agreed to wait for the next version of luatex and see what happens, double-checking if the bit is still executable at the end. Mojca _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~context Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~context More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
