On 8/10/05, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:20:49PM +1200, Rinku wrote: > > >>2) I like the way the 'generated artifacts' are hyperlinked on the > > >>build details page - is it possible not to have the Reports inlined on > > >>the same page but on different page (JUnit, site reports) > > > > > >I'm not sure about inlining the reports - they could be quite large > > >(though I guess the same is true of the build output). If it is going to > > >be a click away anyway, I'm not sure what the advantage is? > > > > - Yep, thats what I meant 'not' inlining the reports or build logs on the > > same page as these can get too big for usability/navigability reasons. I > > think it would be better to keep links to detailed logs/reports. > > > > >> > > >>ohh...btw, Continuum logo is neat :-) ! > > > > > >Yes, I think so too (we're lucky it wasn't me designing it :) > > > > > >- Brett > > > > > Is one one for M2 in design ;-) ? > > > > On another note, we could use Javascripting for doing stuff (hide/show > > project groups, expand nodes...), but what about browsers with Javascript > > disabled? or perhaps I am missing something and its been taken care of (in > > which case we can skip this!) > > Is there really *anyone* that doesn't have a JS enabled browser? I don't > think requiring JS to be enabled for using Continuum is a big deal. > > -- > Trygve >
Yes, we work for a few organisations where its an organisation wide scenario - Javascript is disabled in browsers, and we are required to cater to both cases - JS and non-JS ones (in case of 'public facing' websites) Cheers, Rahul
