Yep, caught your rollback. Thanks for that.

Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Brett,
> 
> we can't use compile class because we don't want jdo stuff in enhanced
> classes.
> 
> Emmanuel
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>> Author: brett
>> Date: Mon Mar 27 08:27:17 2006
>> New Revision: 389193
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389193&view=rev
>> Log:
>> use model classes directly to help it compile
>>
>> Modified:
>>     maven/continuum/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-rpc-client/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified:
>> maven/continuum/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-rpc-client/pom.xml
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/maven/continuum/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-rpc-client/pom.xml?rev=389193&r1=389192&r2=389193&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>>
>> ---
>> maven/continuum/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-rpc-client/pom.xml
>> (original)
>> +++
>> maven/continuum/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-rpc-client/pom.xml
>> Mon Mar 27 08:27:17 2006
>> @@ -31,27 +31,9 @@
>>        <artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId>
>>        <version>1.0.2</version>
>>      </dependency>
>> +    <dependency>
>> +      <groupId>org.apache.maven.continuum</groupId>
>> +      <artifactId>continuum-model</artifactId>
>> +    </dependency>
>>    </dependencies>
>> -
>> -  <build>
>> -    <plugins>
>> -      <plugin>
>> -        <groupId>org.codehaus.modello</groupId>
>> -        <artifactId>modello-maven-plugin</artifactId>
>> -        <version>1.0-alpha-9-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> -        <executions>
>> -          <execution>
>> -            <goals>
>> -              <goal>java</goal>
>> -            </goals>
>> -          </execution>
>> -        </executions>
>> -        <configuration>
>> -          <version>1.0.0</version>
>> -          <packageWithVersion>false</packageWithVersion>
>> -          <model>../continuum-model/src/main/mdo/continuum.mdo</model>
>> -        </configuration>
>> -      </plugin>
>> -    </plugins>
>> -  </build>
>>  </project>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to