Christian Edward Gruber wrote:
Um, 1.0 to 1.1 seems like the right time to break an api if you are
going to eventually.  Better if it were a 1.x to 2.x, but certainly it's
not a 1.0.12 to 1.0.13 situation.  I think it woudl be hard to argue on
a purely needs basis.  Apache as a whole is approaching 500,000 commits
in their subversion repo over its lifetime, which couldn't amount to
more than 4x results in any table, could it?  What are the real
characteristics of how many keys are generated given a repo of a certain
size, etc?

1.0 to a 1.1 is not the time when you break an API. You can add stuff with minor released, but not break things. This is the versioning conventions used for all Maven-related projects. Perhaps trunk should be 2.0, but as long as it's 1.1 it can't break the API.

I didn't understand the last part of your paragraph WRT to the Apache svn repository, please clarify it if I missed your point.

Besides, the database will be broken and need migration or re-building
between 1.0.3 and 1.1 anyway, so that's no barrier.  If we're running
1.1-SNAPSHOTs, well, guess what... they're snapshots - not guaranteed to
function the same upon release.   Not reasons to do it, mind you, just
rebuttals to some reasons to not do it.

That is really not relevant in this case. We're talking about the external API for applications, not the database. Running a tool to alter the database is fine.

--
Trygve


Christian.


Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Rahul Thakur wrote:
'int' ids are now converted to 'long' across the project and to
allow really large values. This should cater to scenarios where the
id generation could be started from an arbitrary large value.
Won't this break the API?
Yep, it would.

What is the use case where 4 billion IDs isn't sufficient?
2 billion you mean :-). But this also more of something that I have
noticed  'traditionally' that ids are specified as long and stored as
bigints in database
No, 4 billion. an int is +-2billion. Anyway, just because longs are
more traditionally used that is not a good enough reason to switch to
longs and break the API to me.

--
Trygve




Reply via email to