On 24 Feb 07, at 1:05 PM 24 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
+1 for a beta, if everything it's cool let's go for 1.1 and push to
-1 for beta
This version has so many changes it cannot be called a beta until it
has been tried en masse. It is most certainly an alpha.
Jason.
1.1.1 whatever else that needs to be fixed
On 2/23/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was talking to trygve a bit on irc and it dovetailed nicely with
some plans I had talked about late last year in regard to
continuum...I am just about a month late is all. We thought we ought
to take a poll on here about continuum and see what folks thought.
This is not a vote, its just a poll and perhaps a discussion starter
on short to mid term plans with continuum. I just know it bothers me
a bit everytime someone pops on IRC and asks questions about
continuum
1.0.3...which is quite aged atm with so many of the bugs on it
resolved on the trunk.
Question: Should we take all the work that has been done on
continuum
in the last year+ and get it pushed out as an Alpha1 or a Milestone1
or some suitable equivalent?
[+1/0/-1]
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
