It fails for me
Here is the output I get.
2005-12-16 11:15:35,361 [Thread-1] INFO ContinuumScm
- Checking out project: 'MDS WMS Merger', id: '1' to
'D:\apache\continuum-1.0.2\bin\..\apps\continuum\working-directory\1'.
Working dir:
D:\apache\continuum-1.0.2\bin\..\apps\continuum\working-directory\1
2005-12-16 11:15:35,439 [Thread-1] INFO ScmManager - Executing:
p4 -H perforce:1666 -u zabil.cm -P ******* client -i
2005-12-16 11:15:35,455 [Thread-1] DEBUG ScmManager - Updating clientspec:
Client: zabil.cm-zabil-cm-MavenSCM
Root: D:\apache\continuum-1.0.2\bin\..\apps\continuum\working-directory\1
View:
//depot/branches/ASG-WMS/IRIApp//...
//zabil.cm-zabil-cm-MavenSCM/...
Description:
Created by maven-scm-provider-perforce
And the dreaded---
2005-12-16 11:15:35,705 [Thread-1] WARN ContinuumScm - Error
while checking out the code for project: 'MDS WMS Merger', id: '1' to
'D:\apache
\continuum-1.0.2\bin\..\apps\continuum\working-directory\1'.
2005-12-16 11:15:35,705 [Thread-1] WARN ContinuumScm - Command output:
2005-12-16 11:15:35,705 [Thread-1] WARN ContinuumScm - Provider message:
Unable to sync
I have used the variable
wrapper.java.additional.6=-Dmaven.scm.perforce.clientspec.name="zabil-cm"
in wrapper.conf
And the url that I am using is
scm:perforce:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1666://depot/branches/ASG-WMS/IRIApp/
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Perforce testing needed
All, I now have a version of the Perforce provider which works on
Continuum 1.0.2 in my own basic testing. I would like to have a few
hardy volunteers to download the patched jar and try it on their own
build by placing it in apps/continuum/lib and restarting Continuum. I'd
advise you to backup the old version but since that one didn't work,
what's the point? :-)
http://www.perham.net/maven-scm-provider-perforce-1.0-beta-2.jar
Notes:
I just used a shell build with NO SCM user/password. The Perforce user
was logged in beforehand so no security was required (similar to doing a
'cvs login' and not having to log in anymore). The clientspec naming is
still being commented on [http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-114 please
"watch" it if you want to participate in the conversation] so little has
changed in that regard.
Please email this list with your success or failures.
mike
